Total bridges
357
Public highway bridges in Mendocino County
County profile · official public datasets
357 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 34.7% rated Good, 57.7% Fair, 7.6% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Mendocino County posts a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Mendocino County ranks #34 of 58 California counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 7.6%). Mendocino County, California contains 357 public highway bridges. Roughly 34.7% are rated “Good,” 57.7% “Fair,” and 7.6% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
357
Public highway bridges in Mendocino County
Good condition
34.7%
124 of 357 rated 7-9
Fair condition
57.7%
206 of 357 rated 5-6
Poor condition
7.6%
27 of 357 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#34 of 58
Among California counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 357 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 3.6% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 7.6% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 2,005 crossings a day against 5,465 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 357 of 357 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
231 of the 357 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 34.7% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
STATE ROUTE 20 over RUSSIAN RIV NCRA/NWP RR, built 1958, carries 11,500 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 27-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 54,128 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
357 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
Built before 1900
1 bridges
1910–1919
3 bridges
1920–1929
8 bridges
1930–1939
25 bridges
1940–1949
27 bridges
1950–1959
58 bridges
1960–1969
93 bridges
1970–1979
29 bridges
1980–1989
43 bridges
1990–1999
27 bridges
2000–2009
13 bridges
2010–2019
28 bridges
2020–2029
2 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 93 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 26.1% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1969) matches the California average (1970).
The 5 California counties nearest Mendocino County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 7.6% Poor share is the 2nd-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1969 against a peer-group mean of 1969 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 57 California counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanislaus County | 386 | 30.8% | 55.7% | 13.5% | 1956 |
| Monterey County | 377 | 56.8% | 35.5% | 7.7% | 1970 |
| Solano County | 373 | 44.8% | 47.5% | 7.8% | 1975 |
| San Mateo County | 361 | 26% | 64% | 10% | 1967 |
| Mendocino County (this page) | 357 | 34.7% | 57.7% | 7.6% | 1969 |
| Placer County | 337 | 44.2% | 51.6% | 4.2% | 1976 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Mendocino County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Mendocino County, both outside California so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside CA (357 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside CA (1969 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: ST RTE 271 (@ PM 19.46)
01-MEN-101-R103.81, Mendocino, CA
Over: MATTOLE RIVER
0.75 MI S HUM CO LINE, Mendocino, CA
Over: PARLIN CREEK
BY JCT RD 320 & RD 340, Mendocino, CA
Over: BIG DANN CREEK
01-MEN-271-4.92, Mendocino, CA
Over: LITTLE RIVER
01-MEN-001-48.05, Mendocino, CA
Over: SHORT CREEK
01-MEN-162-34.03, Mendocino, CA
Over: GUALALA RIVER
01-MEN-001-0.01, Mendocino, CA
Over: MARION LANE
01-MEN-101-R88.80, Mendocino, CA
Over: BURRIGHT CREEK
3.8 MI N RTE 20, Mendocino, CA
Over: WILLITS CREEK
0.02 MI S BIRCH ST, Mendocino, CA
Over: BROADDUS CREEK
01-MEN-020-R32.82-WLTS, Mendocino, CA
Over: W20-N101 CONNECTOR RAMP
01-MEN-020-33.32, Mendocino, CA
Over: OUTLET CREEK
01-MEN-101-50.66, Mendocino, CA
Over: TEN MILE CREEK
01-MEN-101-66.50, Mendocino, CA
Over: BRIDGES CREEK
01-MEN-101-97.47, Mendocino, CA
Over: COLD CREEK
01-MEN-020-R39.16, Mendocino, CA
Over: OCEANSIDE BLUFF
01-MEN-001-3.81, Mendocino, CA
Over: ROCK CREEK
01-MEN-101-93.71, Mendocino, CA
Over: DRY CREEK
01-MEN-128-43.44, Mendocino, CA
Over: ANDERSON CREEK
01-MEN-128-28.29, Mendocino, CA
Over: PIETA CREEK
01-MEN-101-R5.94, Mendocino, CA
Over: SR 271 (@ PM 3.38)
01-MEN-101-R87.67, Mendocino, CA
Over: EAST HILL ROAD
01-MEN-101-44.99, Mendocino, CA
Over: U.S. 101 (@ PM R101.90)
01-MEN-271-17.03, Mendocino, CA
Over: CORRAL CREEK
01-MEN-162-2.21, Mendocino, CA
Over: BEAR PEN RD (PRIVATE)
01-MEN-101-R101.06, Mendocino, CA
Over: DORA CREEK
01-MEN-101-96.49, Mendocino, CA
Over: FORSYTHE CREEK
01-MEN-101-R31.88, Mendocino, CA
Over: U.S. HIGHWAY 101
01-MEN-101-R32.63, Mendocino, CA
Over: HILLSIDE
01-MEN-001-83.54, Mendocino, CA
Over: RUSSIAN NCRA/NWP GEYSERS
01-MEN-101-R0.48, Mendocino, CA
Over: LONG VALLEY CREEK
01-MEN-162-R0.03, Mendocino, CA
Over: DUNN CREEK
01-MEN-001-92.83, Mendocino, CA
Over: FELIZ CREEK
0.1 MI SW SR101 HOPLAND, Mendocino, CA
Over: EEL RIVER
5 MI N MAIN IN POTTR VLY, Mendocino, CA
Over: HENSLEY CREEK
0.2 MI S LAKE MNDOCINO DR, Mendocino, CA
Over: WEST BRANCH RUSSIAN RIV
E OF JCT W RD & TOMKI RD, Mendocino, CA
Over: WILLIAMS CREEK
8.0 MI E/O COVELO, Mendocino, CA
Over: CAHTO CREEK
22.32 MI E FROM SH 1, Mendocino, CA
Over: EAST FORK RUSSIAN RIVER
0.3 MI N RTE 20, Mendocino, CA
Over: RUSSIAN RIVER
0.8 MI E/O RTE 101, Mendocino, CA
Over: SOUTH FORK EEL RIVER
1.8 MI N BRANSCOMB RD, Mendocino, CA
Over: MILL CREEK
1.0 MI E OF SR 162, Mendocino, CA
Over: RANCHERIA CREEK
ADJACENT TO SR 128, Mendocino, CA
Over: TOMKI CREEK
0.2 MI N JCT CR 308, Mendocino, CA
Over: STRING CREEK
4.3 MI NW REYNOLDS HWY, Mendocino, CA
Over: ROBINSON CREEK
3.00 MI N SH 253, Mendocino, CA
Over: ROBINSON CREEK
3.15 MI N SH 253, Mendocino, CA
Over: SOUTH FORK BIG RIVER
13.4 MI W US 101, Mendocino, CA
Over: TURNER CREEK
0.10 MI S CR 327-A, Mendocino, CA
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.