Total bridges
208
Public highway bridges in Noble County
County profile · official public datasets
208 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 45.2% rated Good, 47.6% Fair, 7.2% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Noble County pairs a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with an older average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Noble County ranks #66 of 88 Ohio counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 7.2%). Noble County, Ohio contains 208 public highway bridges. Roughly 45.2% are rated “Good,” 47.6% “Fair,” and 7.2% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
208
Public highway bridges in Noble County
Good condition
45.2%
94 of 208 rated 7-9
Fair condition
47.6%
99 of 208 rated 5-6
Poor condition
7.2%
15 of 208 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#66 of 88
Among Ohio counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 208 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0.8% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 7.2% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 207 crossings a day against 2,346 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 208 of 208 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
131 of the 208 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 45.2% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
SR 513 over BEAVER FORK WILLS CREEK, built 1954, carries 690 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 15-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 3,098 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
208 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1900–1909
52 bridges
1920–1929
1 bridges
1930–1939
7 bridges
1940–1949
10 bridges
1950–1959
12 bridges
1960–1969
48 bridges
1970–1979
5 bridges
1980–1989
6 bridges
1990–1999
31 bridges
2000–2009
16 bridges
2010–2019
19 bridges
2020–2029
1 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1900s, when 52 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 25% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 115 to 124 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1959, 18 years older than the Ohio average of 1977.
The 5 Ohio counties nearest Noble County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 7.2% Poor share is the 5th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1959 against a peer-group mean of 1977 is 18 years older.
Showing the 5 closest of 87 Ohio counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Putnam County | 213 | 54.9% | 40.4% | 4.7% | 1982 |
| Lake County | 210 | 52.9% | 38.6% | 8.6% | 1973 |
| Clinton County | 209 | 73.7% | 24.4% | 1.9% | 1979 |
| Holmes County | 208 | 43.3% | 53.8% | 2.9% | 1978 |
| Noble County (this page) | 208 | 45.2% | 47.6% | 7.2% | 1959 |
| Meigs County | 207 | 45.4% | 51.7% | 2.9% | 1974 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Noble County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Noble County, both outside Ohio so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside OH (208 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside OH (1959 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: CR 21
17.7M N WASH. CO. LINE, Noble, OH
Over: WEST FORK DUCK CREEK
0.1M W OF JCT SR 821, Noble, OH
Over: MIDDLE FORK DUCK CREEK
.02 MI.E.OF JCT. SR.564, Noble, OH
Over: MUD RUN
.71 MI. E. OF JCT. SR.147, Noble, OH
Over: STREAM
.19 MI. E. OF JCT. TR.44, Noble, OH
Over: DUCK CREEK
.02 MI. W. OF JCT. SR.260, Noble, OH
Over: KEITH FORK
.02 MI. N. OF JCT. CR.7, Noble, OH
Over: BUFFALO CREEK
.03 MI S. OF JCT. SR.146, Noble, OH
Over: DUCK CREEK
10.96M N WASH. CO. LINE, Noble, OH
Over: BUFFALO RUN
0.77M N WASH. CO. LINE, Noble, OH
Over: STREAM
3.6M N WASH. CO. LINE, Noble, OH
Over: DUCK CREEK
10.96M N WASH. CO. LINE, Noble, OH
Over: SR 146
16.67M N WASH. CO. LINE, Noble, OH
Over: BUFFALO CREEK
16.8M N WASH. CO. LINE, Noble, OH
Over: WHISKEY RUN
2.39M E OF JCT SR 313, Noble, OH
Over: WEST FORK OF DUCK CREEK
1.36M N WASH. CO. LINE, Noble, OH
Over: DUCK CREEK
.09 MI. S. OF JCT. SR.564, Noble, OH
Over: SALT RUN
.02 MI. E. OF JCT. SR.78, Noble, OH
Over: BEAVER CREEK
300 FEET SOUTH OF C.R.23, Noble, OH
Over: KEITH FORK
.01 MI. N. OF JCT CR7, Noble, OH
Over: GREEN CREEK
.49 MI. E. OF JCT. TR.38, Noble, OH
Over: FLAG RUN
.01 MI. S. OF JCT. TR.242, Noble, OH
Over: BUFFALO CREEK
.28 MI.N.OF JCT.S.R.146, Noble, OH
Over: NORTH FORK
.45 MI. S. OF JCT. CR.44, Noble, OH
Over: SOUTH FORK
.09 MI. E. OF JCT. SR.513, Noble, OH
Over: GREASY RUN
.31 MI. E. OF JCT. TR 488, Noble, OH
Over: BIG RUN
.37 MI. E. OF JCT. TR.9, Noble, OH
Over: Schwab Run
.5 Mi N of Jct. TR263, Noble, OH
Over: Br Cub Run
At intersection w CR 48, Noble, OH
Over: WILLS CREEK
.94 MI. E OF JCT SR513, Noble, OH
Over: CREIGHTON RUN
.04 MI. S. OF JCT. SR.260, Noble, OH
Over: DUCK CREEK
.02 MI. W. OF JCT. SR.260, Noble, OH
Over: OTTERSLIDE RUN
.69 MI. N. OF JCT. SR.564, Noble, OH
Over: DUCK CREEK
0.12M W OF JCT SR 821, Noble, OH
Over: SR 821
11.19M N WASH. CO. LINE, Noble, OH
Over: STREAM
.76 MI. E. OF JCT. CR.8, Noble, OH
Over: WEST FORK DUCK CREEK
.11 MI. W. OF JCT. SR.821, Noble, OH
Over: SHARON FORK
.57 MI. S. OF JCT. TR.8, Noble, OH
Over: GLADY RUN
.02 MI. E. OF JCT. CR.5A, Noble, OH
Over: BIG RUN
.19 MI. N. OF JCT. TR.23, Noble, OH
Over: STREAM
.05 MI. S. OF JCT. CR.9, Noble, OH
Over: BEAVER CREEK
.18 MI. S. OF JCT. SR.147, Noble, OH
Over: BIG RUN
.01 MI. S. OF JCT. TR.16, Noble, OH
Over: STREAM
.34 MI. E. OF JCT. TR.89, Noble, OH
Over: BUFFALO CREEK
.08 MI. W. OF JCT. SR.147, Noble, OH
Over: DUCK CREEK
.03 MI. S. OF JCT. SR.78, Noble, OH
Over: EAST FORK DUCK CREEK
.06 MI. E. OF JCT. SR.145, Noble, OH
Over: DUCK CREEK
.05 MI. W. OF JCT. SR.78, Noble, OH
Over: RANNELLS CREEK
.08 MI. E. OF JCT. SR.83, Noble, OH
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.