Total bridges
387
Public highway bridges in Alfalfa County
County profile · official public datasets
387 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 27.4% rated Good, 66.1% Fair, 6.5% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Alfalfa County pairs a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with a newer average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Alfalfa County ranks #40 of 77 Oklahoma counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 6.5%). Alfalfa County, Oklahoma contains 387 public highway bridges. Roughly 27.4% are rated “Good,” 66.1% “Fair,” and 6.5% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
387
Public highway bridges in Alfalfa County
Good condition
27.4%
106 of 387 rated 7-9
Fair condition
66.1%
256 of 387 rated 5-6
Poor condition
6.5%
25 of 387 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#40 of 77
Among Oklahoma counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 387 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 1.4% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 6.5% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 78 crossings a day against 641 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 387 of 387 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
121 of the 387 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 27.4% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
E0210 (0218C) over EAST CLAY CREEK, built 1999, carries 120 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 25-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 1,949 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
387 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1910–1919
1 bridges
1920–1929
7 bridges
1930–1939
35 bridges
1940–1949
15 bridges
1950–1959
40 bridges
1960–1969
19 bridges
1970–1979
6 bridges
1980–1989
22 bridges
1990–1999
34 bridges
2000–2009
86 bridges
2010–2019
109 bridges
2020–2029
13 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 2010s, when 109 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 28.2% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 5 to 14 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1988, 11 years newer than the Oklahoma average of 1977.
The 5 Oklahoma counties nearest Alfalfa County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 6.5% Poor share is the 3rd-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1988 against a peer-group mean of 1978 is 10 years newer.
Showing the 5 closest of 76 Oklahoma counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muskogee County | 398 | 37.7% | 52.3% | 10.1% | 1971 |
| Creek County | 395 | 40.5% | 38.7% | 20.8% | 1972 |
| Alfalfa County (this page) | 387 | 27.4% | 66.1% | 6.5% | 1988 |
| Custer County | 384 | 73.2% | 25.5% | 1.3% | 1982 |
| Payne County | 384 | 24% | 65.6% | 10.4% | 1982 |
| Stephens County | 382 | 29.1% | 68.1% | 2.9% | 1985 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Alfalfa County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Alfalfa County, both outside Oklahoma so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside OK (387 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside OK (1988 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: WEST CLAY CREEK TRIB.
2E .3S OF YEWED, Alfalfa, OK
Over: BARROW DRAIN
3S OF KS 1W OF SH 8, Alfalfa, OK
Over: DRIFTWOOD CREEK
4.8N OF US 64, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
5.4E OF SH 58, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
4.1W OF 0238C, Alfalfa, OK
Over: DRIFTWOOD CREEK
2.5W .8N OF BURLINGTON, Alfalfa, OK
Over: WEST CLAY CREEK
.1W OF SH 8, Alfalfa, OK
Over: TWIN SPRING CREEK
2M S. 1.9MI W OF JET, Alfalfa, OK
Over: FIELD DRAIN
2E 4.5N OF SH8/64 JCT, Alfalfa, OK
Over: MEDICINE CREEK
1.3 MI.E.OF JCT.SH8, Alfalfa, OK
Over: WAGON CREEK
2N .7E OF GOLTRY, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
1N 5.4W OF YEWED, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
3.2W OF CHEROKEE, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
5N 9.9E OF BYRON, Alfalfa, OK
Over: EAST CLAY CREEK TRIB.
3S .1E OF US64/SH8, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
7W .4S OF CHEROKEE, Alfalfa, OK
Over: TURKEY CREEK
2E 1.4S OF HELENA, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
3W .5N OF CHEROKEE, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
3.7S OF GOLTRY, Alfalfa, OK
Over: LITTLE MULE CREEK
3N 2.1W OF SH 8/11 JCT, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
1.7E OF WOODS C/L, Alfalfa, OK
Over: SPRING CREEK
1N 2.4W OF JET, Alfalfa, OK
Over: WAGON CREEK
3E .9N OF JET, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
2.2N OF YEWED, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
5.3 MI.N.JCT.US64, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
0.6 MI.N.MAJOR CL, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
5W .9S OF CHEROKEE, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
3.1 MI.E.OF JCT.SH8, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
8.5E OF SH8, Alfalfa, OK
Over: SALT FORK ARKANSAS RIVER
1.6 MI.N.JCT.US64, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
3.2 MI.N.JCT.SH8, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
2.3 MI.S.OF JCT.US64, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
8.0 MI.N&W.JCT.US64, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
8.5 M.E OF WOODS C/L, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
1.4 MI.E. OF WOODS CL, Alfalfa, OK
Over: EAGLE CHIEF CREEK TRIB.
2N 3.4W OF ALINE, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
JCT. SH45 & SH58, Alfalfa, OK
Over: LITTLE SANDY CREEK
1N 1.8E OF AMORITA, Alfalfa, OK
Over: EAST CLAY CREEK
1S 9.3W OF JET, Alfalfa, OK
Over: TURKEY CREEK
2S 1.9W OF GOLTRY, Alfalfa, OK
Over: WAGON CREEK TRIB.
4N OF GOLTRY, Alfalfa, OK
Over: TWIN SPRINGS CREEK
2S 2.4W OF JET, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
1N; 1.5W OF INGERSOL, Alfalfa, OK
Over: SPRING CREEK
2S .2E OF SH 45, Alfalfa, OK
Over: TWIN SPRINGS CREEK
1S 1.8W OF JET, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
8 M. E. OF WOODS C/L, Alfalfa, OK
Over: CREEK
3.5 MI.N.MAJOR CL, Alfalfa, OK
Over: WEST CLAY CREEK TRIB.
2N 2.9E OF CARMEN, Alfalfa, OK
Over: STINK CREEK
_, Alfalfa, OK
Over: DRIFTWOOD CREEK
1W 3.1S JCT SH58/SH11, Alfalfa, OK
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.