Total bridges
558
Public highway bridges in Yakima County
County profile · official public datasets
558 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 58.2% rated Good, 36.7% Fair, 5% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Yakima County posts a better-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across large county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Yakima County ranks #18 of 39 Washington counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 5%). Yakima County, Washington contains 558 public highway bridges. Roughly 58.2% are rated “Good,” 36.7% “Fair,” and 5% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
558
Public highway bridges in Yakima County
Good condition
58.2%
325 of 558 rated 7-9
Fair condition
36.7%
205 of 558 rated 5-6
Poor condition
5%
28 of 558 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#18 of 39
Among Washington counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 558 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 7.1% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 5% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry more traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 5,371 crossings a day against 2,820 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 558 of 558 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
313 of the 558 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 58.2% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
I-82 over WASTEWATER NUMBER 3, built 1980, carries 28,146 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 28-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 150,395 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
558 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1900–1909
2 bridges
1910–1919
4 bridges
1920–1929
4 bridges
1930–1939
23 bridges
1940–1949
17 bridges
1950–1959
79 bridges
1960–1969
123 bridges
1970–1979
113 bridges
1980–1989
74 bridges
1990–1999
48 bridges
2000–2009
38 bridges
2010–2019
29 bridges
2020–2029
4 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 123 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 22% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1973) matches the Washington average (1975).
The 5 Washington counties nearest Yakima County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 5% Poor share is the 4th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1973 against a peer-group mean of 1974 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 38 Washington counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yakima County (this page) | 558 | 58.2% | 36.7% | 5% | 1973 |
| Snohomish County | 500 | 49% | 47% | 4% | 1980 |
| Pierce County | 472 | 55.3% | 40.5% | 4.2% | 1974 |
| Lewis County | 419 | 39.4% | 56.8% | 3.8% | 1969 |
| Grays Harbor County | 363 | 48.8% | 41.9% | 9.4% | 1978 |
| Whatcom County | 354 | 44.1% | 50.6% | 5.4% | 1970 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Yakima County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Yakima County, both outside Washington so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside WA (558 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside WA (1973 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: SULPHER CREEK WASTEWAY
5.2 N JCT SR 22, Yakima, WA
Over: WINE COUNTRY RD RR PED
3.8 E JCT SR 241, Yakima, WA
Over: MELLIS ROAD
4.7 E JCT US 97, Yakima, WA
Over: MELLIS ROAD
4.7 E JCT US 97, Yakima, WA
Over: LITTLE NACHES RIVER
ABOVE SALMON FALLS, Yakima, WA
Over: RATTLESNAKE CREEK
00.02 N RATTLESNAKE, Yakima, WA
Over: LITTLE NACHES RIVER
BELOW SALMON FALLS, Yakima, WA
Over: YAKIMA RIVER
0.4 E JCT SR 823, Yakima, WA
Over: NACHES RIVER
0.5 E JCT SR 823, Yakima, WA
Over: MID. FORK LITTLE NACHES
NEAR END OF ASPHALT, Yakima, WA
Over: E POMONA RD
5.3 E KITTITAS CO, Yakima, WA
Over: COUNTY ROAD AND CANAL
3.7 E JCT US 97, Yakima, WA
Over: BN RR & DRAIN CANAL
0.5 E JCT SR 223, Yakima, WA
Over: YAKIMA RIVER
0.1 N JCT I-82, Yakima, WA
Over: I-82
1.9 E JCT US 12, Yakima, WA
Over: SATUS CREEK
4.0 N KLICKITAT CO, Yakima, WA
Over: UP RR
8.9 E JCT SR 223, Yakima, WA
Over: I-82
2.0 E JCT US 12, Yakima, WA
Over: SNIPES MTN LATERAL CANAL
7.5 E JCT SR 223, Yakima, WA
Over: THORP RD
2.5 E JCT US 97, Yakima, WA
Over: UP RR
8.9 E JCT SR 223, Yakima, WA
Over: N.FORK LITLE NACHES RVR
NO DATA ENTERED, Yakima, WA
Over: SLOUGH & CNTY RD
0.2 N JCT I-82, Yakima, WA
Over: YAKIMA AVE
2.0 E JCT US 12, Yakima, WA
Over: MIDVALE ROAD
8.6 E JCT SR 223, Yakima, WA
Over: YAKIMA RIVER
0.1 N JCT I-82, Yakima, WA
Over: NP RY MOXEE
1.1 E JCT US 12, Yakima, WA
Over: YAKIMA RIVER
0.6 E JCT US 97, Yakima, WA
Over: I-82
5.3 E JCT SR 223, Yakima, WA
Over: YAKIMA RIVER
0.6 E JCT US 97, Yakima, WA
Over: I-82
16.7 E JCT SR 410, Yakima, WA
Over: SUNNYSIDE CANAL
5.5 E JCT SR 241, Yakima, WA
Over: I-82
6.5 E JCT US 97, Yakima, WA
Over: I-82
2.0 E JCT SR 22, Yakima, WA
Over: MIDVALE ROAD
8.6 E JCT SR 223, Yakima, WA
Over: I-82
0.1 N JCT I-82, Yakima, WA
Over: NP RY MOXEE
1.1 E JCT US 12, Yakima, WA
Over: COUNTY RD/OLD US 12
5.5 E JCT SR 22, Yakima, WA
Over: I-82
6.1 E JCT SR 241, Yakima, WA
Over: COUNTY ROAD AND CANAL
3.7 E JCT US 97, Yakima, WA
Over: LITTLE NACHES RIVER
ABOVE 1906, Yakima, WA
Over: EAST SELAH
2.4 E JCT SR 821, Yakima, WA
Over: EAST SELAH
2.4 E JCT SR 821, Yakima, WA
Over: YAKIMA RIVER
2.5 N JCT SR 22, Yakima, WA
Over: WAPATO CANAL
00.12 W N HARRAH RD, Yakima, WA
Over: I-82
5.3 E JCT SR 241, Yakima, WA
Over: TEAR-FORSELL ROAD
2.1 E JCT SR 241, Yakima, WA
Over: TEAR-FORSELL ROAD
2.1 E JCT SR 241, Yakima, WA
Over: WINE COUNTRY RD RR PED
3.8 E JCT SR 241, Yakima, WA
Over: SR 223
8.4 E JCT SR 22, Yakima, WA
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.