Understanding Bridge Condition Ratings
How FHWA rates bridge deck, superstructure, and substructure condition on a 0-9 scale, and what each rating means for safety and maintenance priority.
On this register · 2024 NBI
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
FHWA assigns Good, Fair, or Poor from the lowest 0-9 component rating. 42,080 of 623,216 records (6.8%) are Poor. Iowa leads share at 19.16% among 49 inventories with 1,000+ bridges, while Texas's 56,729-bridge catalog is 1.23% Poor.
- 6.8%
- Poor nationwide
- 19.16%
- Iowa · highest share
- 1.14%
- Nevada · lowest share
- 56,729
- Texas inventory
Poor is an inspection category, not a live crossing or closure decision.
The national Good/Fair/Poor split
Every bridge in the NBI carries an overall condition category derived from its lowest rated element on the 0-9 NBI scale: Good (all elements 7+), Fair (lowest element 5-6), or Poor (any element 4 or below). Nationally, 42,080 of 623,216 bridges are in Poor condition.
Condition category, nationwide
Every bridge in the 2024 NBI file, by overall Good/Fair/Poor category.
What "Poor" does not mean
Poor is an inspection category, not a live crossing or closure decision. A bridge stays open and posted for its rated capacity unless the responsible owner determines otherwise, load-restricts it, or closes it. Many Poor-rated bridges carry traffic safely every day while awaiting scheduled repair or replacement funding. See what happens after a Poor rating for the actual decision process.
One weak element decides the category
Because the overall category takes the lowest of the deck, superstructure, and substructure ratings, a bridge with two excellent components and one deteriorating one still lands in the lower category. This is a deliberate conservative design in the NBI methodology, it flags the weakest link rather than averaging it away, but it means a single Poor component can make an otherwise well-maintained structure show up as Poor overall.
Condition isn't the same as age
A bridge's condition rating reflects its most recent inspection, not simply how old it is. Maintenance history, material, traffic load, and local environment (freeze-thaw cycles, coastal salt exposure, flood risk) all shape how a structure ages. Compare a bridge's own construction era against its current rating rather than assuming age alone predicts condition.
What to do with this
Poor is a category the NBI assigns from the weakest rated component, not a verdict that a bridge is unsafe to cross.
- 42,080 bridges nationally carry a Poor rating, see the full state-by-state breakdown before assuming a local pattern is unusual. State condition rankings
- A Poor rating means the responsible owner decides load restriction, repair timing, or closure, it isn't an automatic closure. What happens after a Poor rating
- Look up a specific bridge to see which of the three rated elements is actually driving its category. Search bridges
Condition-category figures are the current FHWA 2024 NBI file; a Poor rating here reflects the bridge's most recent inspection, not a live safety determination.
Sources: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory.
Last updated: April 2026
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.