FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

RILEY RD

Carrying RILEY RD over BALDWIN SLOUGH

200 FT E OF SHADOWOOD RD, Montgomery, Alabama

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Fair
37 t Inventory load rating

Bridge Snapshot: RILEY RD

The RILEY RD bridge in Montgomery, Alabama carries RILEY RD over BALDWIN SLOUGH. It was built in 1975, making it 51 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 2 sections, stretching 5.7 meters (19 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 200 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Alabama bridges. It is owned and maintained by City/Municipal Highway Agency.

The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 5/9. The weakest component sits in fair condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds. Its NBI inventory load rating is 36.5 metric tons.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How RILEY RD compares

▼ 1.8
Load rating vs Alabama average (38.3 t)
Top 43%
Higher load rating than 57% of Alabama bridges
503
Bridges in Montgomery · 9 in Poor condition
RILEY RD 36.5 t
Alabama average 38.3 t

Live comparison across Alabama.

Condition Ratings

Culvert
5/9
Fair (5–6)
Inventory Load Rating
36.5 t
NBI inventory level (metric tons)
Overall Condition
Fair

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1975
Material
Concrete
Number of Spans
2
Structure Length
5.7 m (19 ft)
Owner
City/Municipal Highway Agency
Avg Daily Traffic
200 vehicles/day
Structure Number
016778

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether RILEY RD is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare RILEY RD against other structures in Montgomery and across Alabama. Alabama bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for RILEY RD?

RILEY RD in Montgomery, Alabama on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is RILEY RD inspected?

RILEY RD's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 200 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. RILEY RD is currently shown as Fair condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for RILEY RD?

RILEY RD has an NBI inventory load rating of 36.5 metric tons.

Who is responsible for maintaining RILEY RD?

RILEY RD is owned and maintained by City/Municipal Highway Agency.

How old is RILEY RD and does age affect safety?

RILEY RD was built in 1975, making it 51 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.