Total bridges
185
Public highway bridges in Chambers County
County profile · official public datasets
185 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 51.9% rated Good, 40% Fair, 8.1% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Chambers County posts a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Chambers County ranks #61 of 67 Alabama counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 8.1%). Chambers County, Alabama contains 185 public highway bridges. Roughly 51.9% are rated “Good,” 40% “Fair,” and 8.1% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
185
Public highway bridges in Chambers County
Good condition
51.9%
96 of 185 rated 7-9
Fair condition
40%
74 of 185 rated 5-6
Poor condition
8.1%
15 of 185 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#61 of 67
Among Alabama counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 185 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0.6% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 8.1% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 177 crossings a day against 698 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 185 of 185 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
91 of the 185 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 51.9% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
SR 77 over ALLEN CREEK(HOOTALOCCO), built 1941, carries 1,261 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 15-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 2,652 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
185 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1910–1919
1 bridges
1920–1929
10 bridges
1930–1939
6 bridges
1940–1949
18 bridges
1950–1959
15 bridges
1960–1969
34 bridges
1970–1979
12 bridges
1980–1989
33 bridges
1990–1999
21 bridges
2000–2009
24 bridges
2010–2019
9 bridges
2020–2029
2 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 34 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 18.4% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1973) matches the Alabama average (1974).
The 5 Alabama counties nearest Chambers County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 8.1% Poor share is the 6th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1973 against a peer-group mean of 1970 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 66 Alabama counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butler County | 189 | 27% | 72% | 1.1% | 1976 |
| Chilton County | 189 | 50.3% | 48.7% | 1.1% | 1972 |
| Fayette County | 186 | 30.6% | 68.3% | 1.1% | 1969 |
| Chambers County (this page) | 185 | 51.9% | 40% | 8.1% | 1973 |
| St. Clair County | 183 | 27.3% | 71% | 1.6% | 1967 |
| Lamar County | 181 | 26% | 71.8% | 2.2% | 1966 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Chambers County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Chambers County, both outside Alabama so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside AL (185 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside AL (1973 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: SNAPPER CREEK
2 MI. S. CHAMBERS CO.LAKE, Chambers, AL
Over: BRANCH
0.5 MI. N. LEE CO. LINE, Chambers, AL
Over: CHATAHOSPEE CREEK
3 MI. N.W. LAFAYETTE, Chambers, AL
Over: SANDY CREEK
2.2 MI. S.W. MILLTOWN, Chambers, AL
Over: SANDY CREEK
2.2 MI. S.W. MILLTOWN, Chambers, AL
Over: LEE CREEK
2.1 MI. S.E. DOUBLEHEAD, Chambers, AL
Over: MOORES CREEK
VALLEY, Chambers, AL
Over: MOORES CREEK
TOWN OF LANGDALE, Chambers, AL
Over: CATY CREEK
0.4 MI. S.E. ABANDA, Chambers, AL
Over: PIGEON ROOST CREEK
1 MI. S. E. FOSTER X ROAD, Chambers, AL
Over: BRANCH
0.8 MI. N.E. SPARKLING SP, Chambers, AL
Over: CREEK
1 MI. W. TALLAPOOSA RIVER, Chambers, AL
Over: BRANCH
.2 MI. E. TAL. CO. LINE, Chambers, AL
Over: BRANCH
1.5 MI. S.E. CUSSETA, Chambers, AL
Over: GAY CREEK
2 MI. N.E. FIVE POINTS, Chambers, AL
Over: CARLISLE CREEK
0.6 MI. W. ROCK FENCE, Chambers, AL
Over: STROUD CREEK
CUMBEE MILL, Chambers, AL
Over: DAVIS CREEK
3.4 MI. N.W. FIVE POINTS, Chambers, AL
Over: LITTLE CHATAHOSPEE CREEK
2 MI. S. TRAMMEL C.R., Chambers, AL
Over: HIGHPINE CREEK
4.4 MI N MILLTOWN, Chambers, AL
Over: CHATAHOSPEE CREEK
2 MI. S. W. MARCOOT, Chambers, AL
Over: _OSELIGEE CREEK
_.8 MI S. DENSON, Chambers, AL
Over: LITTLE CHATAHOSPEE CREEK
9 MI E CAMPHILL, Chambers, AL
Over: CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
0.1 MI E OF WEST POINT, Chambers, AL
Over: CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
0.1 MI E OF WEST POINT, Chambers, AL
Over: HOOTALOOCCO CREEK
3 MI. S. PENTON, Chambers, AL
Over: CHIKASANOXEE CREEK
3 MI N PENTON, Chambers, AL
Over: MOORES CK * ABANDONED RR
1.8 MI N FAIRFAX RD, Chambers, AL
Over: LITTLE OSANIPPA CREEK
4.9 MI N CUSSETA RD, Chambers, AL
Over: I-85
CUSSETA ROAD - EXIT 70, Chambers, AL
Over: BRANCH
0.1MI.N.LEE CO.LINE, Chambers, AL
Over: SEABOARD COAST LINE RR
0.5 MI. S. E. STANDING R., Chambers, AL
Over: BRANCH
1 MI. S. NEW HARMONY, Chambers, AL
Over: CSX RAILROAD
TOWN OF LANETT, Chambers, AL
Over: OSANIPPA CREEK
3 MI N CUSSETA ROAD, Chambers, AL
Over: OSANIPPA CREEK
3 MI N CUSSETA ROAD, Chambers, AL
Over: HARDLEY CREEK
0.5 MI. S.W. W. POINT DAM, Chambers, AL
Over: COUNTY LINE CREEK
1.3 MI. W. SIKES, Chambers, AL
Over: EMFINGER BRANCH
1 MI. S.W. CULEBRA, Chambers, AL
Over: MOORES CREEK
FOB JAMES DRIVE, Chambers, AL
Over: LITTLE CHATAHOSPEE CREEK
6 MI. W. LAFAYETTE, Chambers, AL
Over: ROCKY BRANCH
4 MI. N.W. FIVE POINTS, Chambers, AL
Over: BRANCH
2 MI. N.E. LAFAYETTE, Chambers, AL
Over: TAN YARD CREEK
TOWN OF LANETT, Chambers, AL
Over: I-85
CHAMBERS / LEE CO LINE, Chambers, AL
Over: BRANCH
LANETT CITY LIMITS, Chambers, AL
Over: WEST POINT RESERVOIR
8 MI. N.E. FREDONIA, Chambers, AL
Over: MOORES CREEK
TOWN OF LANETT, Chambers, AL
Over: I-85
JCT I-85 / US 29(EXIT 79), Chambers, AL
Over: WESTERN R. R. OF ALABAMA
.7 MI. S. W. HUGULEY, Chambers, AL
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.