Total bridges
324
Public highway bridges in Limestone County
County profile · official public datasets
324 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 45.1% rated Good, 52.8% Fair, 2.2% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Limestone County posts a better-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Limestone County ranks #26 of 67 Alabama counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 2.2%). Limestone County, Alabama contains 324 public highway bridges. Roughly 45.1% are rated “Good,” 52.8% “Fair,” and 2.2% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
324
Public highway bridges in Limestone County
Good condition
45.1%
146 of 324 rated 7-9
Fair condition
52.8%
171 of 324 rated 5-6
Poor condition
2.2%
7 of 324 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#26 of 67
Among Alabama counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 324 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0.1% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 2.2% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 149 crossings a day against 2,633 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 324 of 324 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
196 of the 324 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 45.1% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
PETTUSVILLE RD over BRANCH, built 1952, carries 300 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 7-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 1,045 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
324 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1910–1919
1 bridges
1920–1929
12 bridges
1930–1939
11 bridges
1940–1949
32 bridges
1950–1959
61 bridges
1960–1969
64 bridges
1970–1979
24 bridges
1980–1989
28 bridges
1990–1999
34 bridges
2000–2009
21 bridges
2010–2019
16 bridges
2020–2029
20 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 64 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 19.8% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1972) matches the Alabama average (1974).
The 5 Alabama counties nearest Limestone County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 2.2% Poor share is the 2nd-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1972 against a peer-group mean of 1971 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 66 Alabama counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shelby County | 344 | 41% | 58.1% | 0.9% | 1981 |
| Covington County | 332 | 31.9% | 63% | 5.1% | 1970 |
| Limestone County (this page) | 324 | 45.1% | 52.8% | 2.2% | 1972 |
| Jackson County | 314 | 29% | 67.2% | 3.8% | 1961 |
| DeKalb County | 300 | 31.3% | 62% | 6.7% | 1967 |
| Walker County | 275 | 36.4% | 58.2% | 5.5% | 1974 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Limestone County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Limestone County, both outside Alabama so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside AL (324 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside AL (1972 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: Gravel Branch
SEC31 T1S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: SWAN CR RELIEF
SEC19 T4S R4W, Limestone, AL
Over: MAPLE SWAMP BRANCH
SEC29 T2S R6W, Limestone, AL
Over: LITTLE PINEY CR
SEC25 T1S R4W, Limestone, AL
Over: STEWART BRANCH
SEC29 T2S R6W, Limestone, AL
Over: LIMESTONE CREEK FORK
SEC11 T1S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: PETTY BRANCH
SEC 28 T3S R6W, Limestone, AL
Over: MUD CREEK FORK
SEC36 T3S R5W, Limestone, AL
Over: MARTIN BR
SEC28 T3S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: JOHNSON BR
SEC8 T3S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: PINEY CR
SEC9 T1S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: BRANCH
3.1 MI W JCT SR 2 & SR 3, Limestone, AL
Over: BRILEY CR
SEC35 T3S R5W, Limestone, AL
Over: DEMENT CR
SEC31 T1S R6W, Limestone, AL
Over: LAKE CR
SEC26 T3S R5W, Limestone, AL
Over: _ROUND ISLAND CREEK
_SEC 1 T35 R5W, Limestone, AL
Over: OAKLAND SPRING BR
SEC2 T4S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: MAPLE SWAMP BR
SEC17 T2S R6W, Limestone, AL
Over: ROUND ISLAND CR
SEC16 T3S R5W, Limestone, AL
Over: ELK RIVER RELIEF
SEC27 T1S R5W, Limestone, AL
Over: MUD CREEK
SEC8 T4S R4W, Limestone, AL
Over: MCGOWAN BRANCH
SEC9 T2S R6W, Limestone, AL
Over: PINEY CR
SEC5 T2SR3W, Limestone, AL
Over: COPPERRUN BR
SEC13 T3S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: LIMESTONE CR
SEC2 T3S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: LITTLE LIMESTONE CR
SEC23 T1S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: MILL CR
SEC17 T1S R4W, Limestone, AL
Over: PINEY CREEK SLOUGH
SEC25 T4S R4W, Limestone, AL
Over: SUGAR CREEK RELIEF
SEC2T2SR6W, Limestone, AL
Over: BRANCH
SEC9 T1S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: BRANCH
SEC26 T3S R5W, Limestone, AL
Over: RAGSDALE CREEK
SEC 3 T1S R4W, Limestone, AL
Over: I 565
6.6 MI E JCT I 65 & I 565, Limestone, AL
Over: PINEY CR
SEC7 T2S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: BR
SEC23 T4S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: SPRING CR
SEC18 T4S R4W, Limestone, AL
Over: JOHNSON BR
SEC4 T3S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: SHACK BR
SEC17 T1S R6W, Limestone, AL
Over: BRANCH
SEC26 T2S R6W, Limestone, AL
Over: BIG CR
SEC25 T2S R6W, Limestone, AL
Over: PINEY SPRING BR
SEC25 T4S R4W, Limestone, AL
Over: Frenchs Mill Creek
Mooresville Road, Limestone, AL
Over: BRANCH
SEC14 T3S R3W, Limestone, AL
Over: LITTLE PINEY CREEK
SEC1 T2S R4W, Limestone, AL
Over: MUDDY CREEK
SEC34 T1S R4W, Limestone, AL
Over: COXEY CREEK
SEC16 T35 R6W, Limestone, AL
Over: MUD CR
SEC31 T3S R5W, Limestone, AL
Over: SWAN CREEK
SEC21 T2S R4W, Limestone, AL
Over: Tennessee River Relief
1 M N JCT SR 3 & SR 20, Limestone, AL
Over: Tennessee River Relief
1 M N JCT SR 3 & SR 20, Limestone, AL
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.