Total bridges
450
Public highway bridges in Tehama County
County profile · official public datasets
450 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 36.9% rated Good, 56.2% Fair, 6.9% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Tehama County pairs a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with an older average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Tehama County ranks #30 of 58 California counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 6.9%). Tehama County, California contains 450 public highway bridges. Roughly 36.9% are rated “Good,” 56.2% “Fair,” and 6.9% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
450
Public highway bridges in Tehama County
Good condition
36.9%
166 of 450 rated 7-9
Fair condition
56.2%
253 of 450 rated 5-6
Poor condition
6.9%
31 of 450 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#30 of 58
Among California counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 450 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 4.4% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 6.9% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 2,260 crossings a day against 5,157 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 450 of 450 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
352 of the 450 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 36.9% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
INTERSTATE 5 over THOMES CREEK, built 2011, carries 29,500 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 31-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 70,056 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
450 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1900–1909
1 bridges
1910–1919
21 bridges
1920–1929
24 bridges
1930–1939
47 bridges
1940–1949
37 bridges
1950–1959
41 bridges
1960–1969
155 bridges
1970–1979
35 bridges
1980–1989
44 bridges
1990–1999
15 bridges
2000–2009
19 bridges
2010–2019
8 bridges
2020–2029
3 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 155 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 34.4% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1961, 9 years older than the California average of 1970.
The 5 California counties nearest Tehama County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 6.9% Poor share is the 5th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1961 against a peer-group mean of 1968 is 7 years older.
Showing the 5 closest of 57 California counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shasta County | 492 | 47.6% | 49.4% | 3% | 1967 |
| Tehama County (this page) | 450 | 36.9% | 56.2% | 6.9% | 1961 |
| Imperial County | 444 | 50.7% | 40.5% | 8.8% | 1968 |
| Butte County | 437 | 31.8% | 62% | 6.2% | 1958 |
| Siskiyou County | 421 | 39% | 55.6% | 5.5% | 1971 |
| Santa Barbara County | 418 | 51.4% | 42.8% | 5.7% | 1975 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Tehama County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Tehama County, both outside California so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside CA (450 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside CA (1961 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: INTERSTATE 5
02-TEH-005-R6.99, Tehama, CA
Over: INTERSTATE 5
02-TEH-005-R5.77, Tehama, CA
Over: MARTIN CREEK
02-TEH-172-0.20, Tehama, CA
Over: TAYLORS WASH
02-TEH-005-40.95, Tehama, CA
Over: SACRAMENTO RIVER
02-TEH-005-R25.40-RBL, Tehama, CA
Over: INTERSTATE 5
02-TEH-036-L39.92, Tehama, CA
Over: INTERSTATE 5
02-TEH-005-R24.87-RBL, Tehama, CA
Over: KOPTA CREEK
02-TEH-005-R10.68, Tehama, CA
Over: SCHRAMM CREEK
02-TEH-005-R6.24, Tehama, CA
Over: SINGER CREEK
02-TEH-099-0.23, Tehama, CA
Over: SOUTH FORK DIBBLE CREEK
02-TEH-036-R39.14, Tehama, CA
Over: DIBBLE CREEK
02-TEH-036-L39.90-RBL, Tehama, CA
Over: MILL CREEK
02-TEH-099-13.33, Tehama, CA
Over: TOOMES CREEK
02-TEH-099-8.38, Tehama, CA
Over: JACKSON CREEK
0.4 MI E SAN BENITO AVE, Tehama, CA
Over: JEWETT CREEK
1.1 MI S OF SOUTH AVE, Tehama, CA
Over: REEDS CREEK
0.6 MI NORTH OF LUTHER RD, Tehama, CA
Over: BURCH CREEK
0.2 MI S/O CORNING RD, Tehama, CA
Over: JACKSON CREEK
0.6 MI W HIGHWAY 99W, Tehama, CA
Over: CORNING CANAL
0.6 MI W OF I-5, Tehama, CA
Over: N FORK MCCLURE CREEK
0.7 MI N OF GYLE RD, Tehama, CA
Over: UNNAMED STREAM
12.3 MI E OF I-5, Tehama, CA
Over: TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL
0.2 MI E OF SAN BENITO, Tehama, CA
Over: ADAMS CREEK
0.4 MI W BOWMAN RD, Tehama, CA
Over: UNNAMED DRAINAGE
0.6 MI N OF KAUFFMAN AVE, Tehama, CA
Over: MCCARTY CREEK
2.25 MI. N OF PASKENTA RD, Tehama, CA
Over: CHAMPLIN SLOUGH
0.4 MI W TEHAMA VINA ROAD, Tehama, CA
Over: JACKSON CREEK
EAST CHARD AVE, Tehama, CA
Over: CORNING CANAL
EAST OF RAWSON ROAD, Tehama, CA
Over: GAY CREEK
0.1 MI W MALTON AVE, Tehama, CA
Over: DIGGER CREEK
0.3 MI UPSTREAM 8C-190, Tehama, CA
Over: JEWETT CREEK
1.0 MI W OF RAWSON RD, Tehama, CA
Over: GRASSHOPPER CREEK
.4 MI S/O VISTA WAY, Tehama, CA
Over: HOOKER CREEK
AT BASLER ROAD, Tehama, CA
Over: TRUCKEE CREEK
0.2 MI N HAMILTON AVE, Tehama, CA
Over: BASLER CREEK
3.1 MI N/W OF I-5, Tehama, CA
Over: UNNAMED DRAINAGE
3.8 MI N/W OF I-5, Tehama, CA
Over: UNNAMED DRAINAGE
4.9 MI N/W OF I-5, Tehama, CA
Over: NORTH FORK KOPTA SLOUGH
0.7 MI E OF CR 99W, Tehama, CA
Over: CHAMPLIN SLOUGH
0.60 MI E OF SH 99, Tehama, CA
Over: CHAMPLIN SLOUGH
0.7 MI E OF S.H. 99, Tehama, CA
Over: NORTH FORK KOPTA SLOUGH
1/4 MI S ORANGEWOOD RD, Tehama, CA
Over: JEWETT CREEK
0.1 MI S/O FIG LANE, Tehama, CA
Over: CHINA SLOUGH
0.3 MI W/O SR 99, Tehama, CA
Over: KOPTA SLOUGH
0.4 KM E. OF HALL ROAD, Tehama, CA
Over: TRUCKEE CREEK
0.2 MI N OF HAMILTON AVE, Tehama, CA
Over: HOOKER CREEK
2.5 MI WEST OF I-5, Tehama, CA
Over: UNNAMED DRAINAGE
2.7 M FROM HOOKER CR RD, Tehama, CA
Over: TEHAMA SLOUGH
ADJACENT TO 5TH ST., Tehama, CA
Over: NORTH FORK BATTLE CREEK
TEHAMA/SHASTA CO. LINE, Tehama, CA
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.