Total bridges
15
Public highway bridges in Oscoda County
County profile · official public datasets
15 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 33.3% rated Good, 46.7% Fair, 20% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Oscoda County pairs a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with a newer average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Oscoda County ranks #78 of 83 Michigan counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 20%). Oscoda County, Michigan contains 15 public highway bridges. Roughly 33.3% are rated “Good,” 46.7% “Fair,” and 20% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
15
Public highway bridges in Oscoda County
Good condition
33.3%
5 of 15 rated 7-9
Fair condition
46.7%
7 of 15 rated 5-6
Poor condition
20%
3 of 15 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#78 of 83
Among Michigan counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 15 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 4% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 20% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 323 crossings a day against 1,210 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 15 of 15 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
3 of the 15 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 33.3% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
CAMP TEN ROAD over AU SABLE RIVER, built 1976, carries 730 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 3-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 969 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
15 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1950–1959
2 bridges
1960–1969
1 bridges
1970–1979
1 bridges
1980–1989
3 bridges
1990–1999
1 bridges
2000–2009
5 bridges
2010–2019
2 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 2000s, when 5 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 33.3% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 15 to 24 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1989, 13 years newer than the Michigan average of 1976.
The 5 Michigan counties nearest Oscoda County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 20% Poor share is the 6th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1989 against a peer-group mean of 1977 is 12 years newer.
Showing the 5 closest of 82 Michigan counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montmorency County | 21 | 57.1% | 42.9% | 0% | 1995 |
| Charlevoix County | 18 | 38.9% | 44.4% | 16.7% | 1973 |
| Antrim County | 15 | 46.7% | 40% | 13.3% | 1980 |
| Kalkaska County | 15 | 46.7% | 46.7% | 6.7% | 1975 |
| Oscoda County (this page) | 15 | 33.3% | 46.7% | 20% | 1989 |
| Keweenaw County | 12 | 33.3% | 58.3% | 8.3% | 1963 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Oscoda County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Oscoda County, both outside Michigan so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside MI (15 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside MI (1989 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: AU SABLE RIVER
SEC 2-3 BIG CREEK TWP, Oscoda, MI
Over: COMMINS CREEK
MENTOR TWP SEC 11, Oscoda, MI
Over: W BR BIG CREEK
4.1 MI E OF CRAWFORD COL, Oscoda, MI
Over: AU SABLE RIVER
SEC 15 MENTOR TWP, Oscoda, MI
Over: AU SABLE RIVER
0.7 MI N OF S JCT M-72, Oscoda, MI
Over: WEST BR BIG CREEK
SEC 4-33 BIG CREEK TWP, Oscoda, MI
Over: E BR BIG CREEK
5.3 MI E OF CRAWFORD COL, Oscoda, MI
Over: BIG CREEK
SEC 12-18 BIG CREEK TWP, Oscoda, MI
Over: WEST BR BIG CREEK
SEC 23-24 BIG CREEK TWP, Oscoda, MI
Over: PERRY CREEK
MENTOR TWP SEC 9, Oscoda, MI
Over: EAST BR BIG CREEK
SEC 25 BIG CREEK TWP, Oscoda, MI
Over: CHERRY CREEK
MENTOR TWP SEC 5, Oscoda, MI
Over: AU SABLE RIVER
SEC. 3 BIG CREEK TWP, Oscoda, MI
Over: BIG CREEK
SEC 13-24 BIG CREEK TWP, Oscoda, MI
Over: WEST BR BIG CREEK
SEC 23-26 BIG CREEK TWP, Oscoda, MI
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.