Total bridges
242
Public highway bridges in Tuscola County
County profile · official public datasets
242 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 33.9% rated Good, 61.2% Fair, 5% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Tuscola County posts a top-quartile lowest Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Tuscola County ranks #9 of 83 Michigan counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 5%). Tuscola County, Michigan contains 242 public highway bridges. Roughly 33.9% are rated “Good,” 61.2% “Fair,” and 5% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
242
Public highway bridges in Tuscola County
Good condition
33.9%
82 of 242 rated 7-9
Fair condition
61.2%
148 of 242 rated 5-6
Poor condition
5%
12 of 242 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#9 of 83
Among Michigan counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 242 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 8.1% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 5% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry more traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 1,732 crossings a day against 1,031 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 242 of 242 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
97 of the 242 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 33.9% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
M-46 over CHEBOYGAN & BRANCHES DRN, built 1939, carries 6,701 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 12-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 20,782 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
242 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1920–1929
2 bridges
1930–1939
11 bridges
1940–1949
4 bridges
1950–1959
3 bridges
1960–1969
39 bridges
1970–1979
70 bridges
1980–1989
46 bridges
1990–1999
28 bridges
2000–2009
18 bridges
2010–2019
18 bridges
2020–2029
3 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1970s, when 70 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 28.9% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 45 to 54 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1980) matches the Michigan average (1976).
The 5 Michigan counties nearest Tuscola County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 5% Poor share is the 1st-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1980 against a peer-group mean of 1977 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 82 Michigan counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washtenaw County | 262 | 23.3% | 56.5% | 20.2% | 1975 |
| Ottawa County | 254 | 40.9% | 52.8% | 6.3% | 1977 |
| Allegan County | 244 | 24.2% | 59% | 16.8% | 1978 |
| Tuscola County (this page) | 242 | 33.9% | 61.2% | 5% | 1980 |
| Ingham County | 241 | 15.8% | 68.9% | 15.4% | 1972 |
| Lenawee County | 225 | 47.6% | 39.6% | 12.9% | 1981 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Tuscola County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Tuscola County, both outside Michigan so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside MI (242 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside MI (1980 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: NORTH BR CASS RIVER
SEC 13-24 ELKLAND TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: SOUTH BR WHITE CREEK
SEC 7 KINGSTON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: S. O. DRAIN
SEC 29-32 WELLS TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: GILBERT BR WISCOGGIN DRN
3.0 MI EAST OF AKRON, Tuscola, MI
Over: ALLEN EXTN DRAIN
SEC 16 FAIRGROVE TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: S. O. DRAIN
SEC 32 WELLS TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: WHITE CREEK I/C DRAIN
SEC 19-20 NOVESTA TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: WHITE CREEK I/C DRAIN
SEC 21-22 NOVESTA TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: SOUTH BR WHITE CREEK
SEC 6-7 KINGSTON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: WHITE CREEK I/C DRAIN
SEC 19-30 NOVESTA TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: SCOTT DRAIN
SEC 31 INDIANFIELDS TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: KREGER DRAIN
2.0 MI NW OF MAYVILLE LTS, Tuscola, MI
Over: LATIMER OR ALLEN RELIEF
SEC 17-20 AKRON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: GOODING CREEK
SEC 13 TUSCOLA TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: ALLEN DRAIN
SEC 29-32 AKRON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: SUCKER CREEK DRAIN
SEC 11-12 DAYTON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: SOUTHGATE DRAIN
SEC 6-7 AKRON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: SOUTHGATE DRAIN
SEC 7-18 AKRON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: ALLEN DRAIN #1
SEC 20-29 AKRON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: ALLEN EXT DRAIN
SEC 32-33 AKRON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: THETFORD-ARBELA I/C DRN
SEC 23-26 ARBELA TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: NORTHWEST DRAIN
SEC 2 DENMARK TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: EVERGREEN CREEK
SEC 1 VASSAR TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: WISCOGGIN DRAIN
SEC 24-25 AKRON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: BR EVERGREEN CREEK
SEC 23-24 WATERTOWN TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: FOSTORIA DRAIN
SEC 26-35 WATERTOWN TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: SUCKER CREEK
SEC 17-20 WELLS TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: CASS RIVER
IN VASSAR, Tuscola, MI
Over: MURDICK-VANSICKLAND DRN
SEC 15-22 KOYLTON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: CENTER LINE DRAIN
SEC 20 GILFORD TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: ALLEN DRAIN
SEC 5 AKRON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: WHITE CREEK DRAIN #2
SEC 1-2 KOYLTON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: PERRY CREEK
SEC 7 MILLINGTON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: NORTHWEST DRAIN
SEC 18 FAIRGROVE TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: QUANICASSEE RIVER
0.8 MI E OF BAY CO LINE, Tuscola, MI
Over: NORTH BR CASS RIVER
SEC 34 ELKLAND TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: ALLEN DRAIN
SEC 17-20 AKRON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: BR 1 SQUAW CK-GILFORD DN
SEC 31-32 GILFORD TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: WHITE CREEK I/C DRAIN
SEC 23-34 NOVESTA TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: WISCOGGIN DAIRN
SEC 12-13 AKRON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: PERRY CREEK
SEC 28 TUSCOLA TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: ALLEN EXTN DRAIN
SEC 15-16 FAIRGROVE TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: WISCOGGIN DRAIN
SEC 15-16 AKRON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: WHITE CREEK DRAIN #2
SEC 27-28 KINGSTON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: SUCKER CREEK
SEC 1 INDIANFIELDS TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: WISCOGGIN DRAIN
SEC 16-17 AKRON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: NORTHWEST DRAIN OUTLET 3
SEC 25-36 WISNER TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: CASS RIVER
SEC 20 INDIANFIELDS TWP, Tuscola, MI
Over: SUCKER CREEK
2.8 MI E OF M-24, Tuscola, MI
Over: ALLEN DRAIN
SEC 29-32 AKRON TWP, Tuscola, MI
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.