Total bridges
129
Public highway bridges in Scott County
County profile · official public datasets
129 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 65.9% rated Good, 33.3% Fair, 0.8% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Scott County pairs a top-10% lowest Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with a newer average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Scott County ranks #5 of 87 Minnesota counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 0.8%). Scott County, Minnesota contains 129 public highway bridges. Roughly 65.9% are rated “Good,” 33.3% “Fair,” and 0.8% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
129
Public highway bridges in Scott County
Good condition
65.9%
85 of 129 rated 7-9
Fair condition
33.3%
43 of 129 rated 5-6
Poor condition
0.8%
1 of 129 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#5 of 87
Among Minnesota counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 129 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 0.8% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 280 crossings a day against 8,525 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 129 of 129 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
21 of the 129 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 65.9% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
CR 64 over SAND CREEK, built 1965, carries 280 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 1-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 280 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
129 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1900–1909
1 bridges
1930–1939
3 bridges
1950–1959
5 bridges
1960–1969
9 bridges
1970–1979
8 bridges
1980–1989
7 bridges
1990–1999
49 bridges
2000–2009
22 bridges
2010–2019
19 bridges
2020–2029
6 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1990s, when 49 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 38% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 25 to 34 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1993, 7 years newer than the Minnesota average of 1986.
The 5 Minnesota counties nearest Scott County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 0.8% Poor share is the 1st-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1993 against a peer-group mean of 1988 is 5 years newer.
Showing the 5 closest of 86 Minnesota counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renville County | 141 | 66% | 24.1% | 9.9% | 1991 |
| Todd County | 136 | 75.7% | 21.3% | 2.9% | 1990 |
| Murray County | 134 | 81.3% | 13.4% | 5.2% | 1986 |
| Steele County | 134 | 57.5% | 41% | 1.5% | 1987 |
| Scott County (this page) | 129 | 65.9% | 33.3% | 0.8% | 1993 |
| Traverse County | 121 | 65.3% | 33.1% | 1.7% | 1985 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Scott County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Scott County, both outside Minnesota so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside MN (129 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside MN (1993 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: PRIOR LAKE
W OF MARTINSON ISLAND, Scott, MN
Over: SAND CREEK
0.1 MI NE OF JCT CSAH 9, Scott, MN
Over: CREDIT RIVER
0.2 MI S OF JCT TH 13, Scott, MN
Over: SAND CREEK
0.3 MI W OF JCT TH 169, Scott, MN
Over: CREDIT RIVER
1.7 MI E OF JCT TH 101, Scott, MN
Over: STREAM
0.1 MI N OF JCT TH 169, Scott, MN
Over: SAND CREEK
0.2 MI SE OF TH21, Scott, MN
Over: I 35
7.2 MI N OF JCT TH 19, Scott, MN
Over: DITCH
0.1 MI E OF JCT TH 21, Scott, MN
Over: Porter Creek
4.6 MI S OF JCT TH 282, Scott, MN
Over: RAVEN STREAM
0.8 MI E OF JCT TH21, Scott, MN
Over: PICHA CREEK
2.6 MI S OF JCT TH 41, Scott, MN
Over: W BR RAVEN STREAM
0.8 MI S OF JCT CSAH 4, Scott, MN
Over: SAND CREEK
0.2 MI N OF JCT TH19, Scott, MN
Over: I 35
10.7 MI N OF JCT TH 19, Scott, MN
Over: SAND CREEK
0.5 MI W OF JCT CSAH 15, Scott, MN
Over: I 35
8.7 MI N OF JCT TH 19, Scott, MN
Over: SAND CREEK
0.4 MI SE OF JCT TH 169, Scott, MN
Over: UP RR
0.1 MI W OF JCT TH 21, Scott, MN
Over: US 169; RAMPS
AT THE JCT OF TH 169; 25, Scott, MN
Over: TH 13
JCT TH101 AND TH13, Scott, MN
Over: UP RR; CSAH 18
5.9 MI SW OF JCT TH 494, Scott, MN
Over: TH 169R WB
7.1 MI SW OF JCT TH 494, Scott, MN
Over: PORTER CREEK
0.1 MI N OF JCT CSAH56, Scott, MN
Over: STREAM
1.8 MI E OF JCT TH 41, Scott, MN
Over: TH 801B
5.7 MI SW OF JCT TH 494, Scott, MN
Over: STREAM
0.1 MI N OF JCT TH 169, Scott, MN
Over: STREAM
0.1 MI S OF JCT TH 169, Scott, MN
Over: CSAH 83
6.2 MI E OF JCT TH 41, Scott, MN
Over: US 169; RAMPS
AT THE JCT OF TH 169; 25, Scott, MN
Over: CSAH 18
6.0 MI SW OF JCT TH 494, Scott, MN
Over: UP RR
1.3 MI W OF JCT TH 13, Scott, MN
Over: US 169
2.8 MI E OF JCT TH 41, Scott, MN
Over: TH 21
AT JCT TH 21, Scott, MN
Over: US 169
2.3 MI E OF JCT TH 41, Scott, MN
Over: US 169
4.2 MI E OF JCT TH 41, Scott, MN
Over: CSAH 101
5.7 MI SW OF JCT TH 494, Scott, MN
Over: US 169
3.4 MI E OF JCT TH 41, Scott, MN
Over: UP RR
1.3 MI W OF JCT TH 13, Scott, MN
Over: TH 169R WB
7.1 MI SW OF JCT TH 494, Scott, MN
Over: MSAS 131
5.9 MI E OF JCT TH 41, Scott, MN
Over: TH 169R
0.8 MI E OF JCT TH 169, Scott, MN
Over: PORTER CREEK; CD # 5
1.7 MI E; N OF JCT TH 13, Scott, MN
Over: SAND CREEK
0.1 MI S OF JCT TH 282, Scott, MN
Over: CREEK
0.3 M SE OF JCT CSAH 42, Scott, MN
Over: PORTER CREEK
1.3 MI S OF JCT CSAH 10, Scott, MN
Over: CP RAIL
0.1 MI E OF JCT CSAH 31, Scott, MN
Over: SAND CREEK
0.4 MI N OF JCT TH 169, Scott, MN
Over: PRIOR LAKE OUTLET CHN
0.1MI E OF INNOVATION BLV, Scott, MN
Over: W BR RAVEN STREAM
0.5 MI E OF JCT CSAH 11, Scott, MN
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.