Total bridges
398
Public highway bridges in Muskogee County
County profile · official public datasets
398 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 37.7% rated Good, 52.3% Fair, 10.1% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Muskogee County pairs a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with an older average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Muskogee County ranks #55 of 77 Oklahoma counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 10.1%). Muskogee County, Oklahoma contains 398 public highway bridges. Roughly 37.7% are rated “Good,” 52.3% “Fair,” and 10.1% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
398
Public highway bridges in Muskogee County
Good condition
37.7%
150 of 398 rated 7-9
Fair condition
52.3%
208 of 398 rated 5-6
Poor condition
10.1%
40 of 398 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#55 of 77
Among Oklahoma counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 398 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 1.6% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 10.1% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 511 crossings a day against 2,733 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 398 of 398 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
225 of the 398 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 37.7% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
FAU 6784 CALLAHAN over UP R.R. UNDER, built 1905, carries 7,560 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 40-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 20,435 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
398 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1900–1909
2 bridges
1910–1919
5 bridges
1920–1929
7 bridges
1930–1939
59 bridges
1940–1949
34 bridges
1950–1959
27 bridges
1960–1969
70 bridges
1970–1979
48 bridges
1980–1989
42 bridges
1990–1999
33 bridges
2000–2009
28 bridges
2010–2019
31 bridges
2020–2029
12 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 70 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 17.6% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1971, 6 years older than the Oklahoma average of 1977.
The 5 Oklahoma counties nearest Muskogee County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 10.1% Poor share is the 5th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1971 against a peer-group mean of 1979 is 8 years older.
Showing the 5 closest of 76 Oklahoma counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pittsburg County | 411 | 47.2% | 45% | 7.8% | 1971 |
| Pottawatomie County | 408 | 21.6% | 72.1% | 6.4% | 1982 |
| Muskogee County (this page) | 398 | 37.7% | 52.3% | 10.1% | 1971 |
| Creek County | 395 | 40.5% | 38.7% | 20.8% | 1972 |
| Alfalfa County | 387 | 27.4% | 66.1% | 6.5% | 1988 |
| Custer County | 384 | 73.2% | 25.5% | 1.3% | 1982 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Muskogee County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Muskogee County, both outside Oklahoma so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside OK (398 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside OK (1971 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: U.S. 69 UNDER
5.3 MI N MCINTOSH C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: U.S. 69 UNDER
8.6 MI N MCINTOSH C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: UP R.R. UNDER
5.7 MI E JCT SH 16, Muskogee, OK
Over: UP R.R. UNDER
5.7 MI E JCT SH 16, Muskogee, OK
Over: CREEK
2.9 MI S OF SH 16, Muskogee, OK
Over: CREEK
2.4N; 1.2W OF OKTAHA, Muskogee, OK
Over: U.S. 64 UNDER
AT JCT US 64B, Muskogee, OK
Over: DIRTY CREEK OFLOW
15.5 MI S JCT US 62B, Muskogee, OK
Over: MANARD BAYOU TRIB.
10.0 MI E JCT SH 16, Muskogee, OK
Over: NINNAHEAD CREEK
4.7 MI E C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: S FORK OF ASH CREEK
2.2N;2W OF SH 16 & 72, Muskogee, OK
Over: ARKANSAS RIVER
SEQUOYAH C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: COATA CREEK
1.4 MI E US 64, Muskogee, OK
Over: 5166C UNDER
8.1 MI E C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: 5166C (ROSS RD.) UNDER
8.1 MI E C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: BIG GREEN LEAF CREEK
6.5 MI N C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: SPANIARD CREEK
9.4 MI S JCT US 62B, Muskogee, OK
Over: MANARD TRIB.
18.4 MI N C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: COOPER CREEK
.4N OF US62/SH10, Muskogee, OK
Over: PECAN CREEK
8.7 MI E JCT SH 16, Muskogee, OK
Over: U.S. 64 UNDER
AT JCT US 64B, Muskogee, OK
Over: ROSS LAKE
4.3 MI E JCT SH 16, Muskogee, OK
Over: ROSS LAKE
4.3 MI E JCT SH 16, Muskogee, OK
Over: ARKANSAS RIV./SRVC RD.
3.4 MI N JCT US 62 W, Muskogee, OK
Over: UP R.R. UNDER
0.2 MI S JCT US 165, Muskogee, OK
Over: I-40 UNDER
11.2 MI E C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: CHANDLER ST. UNDER
2.1 MI S JCT US 62, Muskogee, OK
Over: S.H. 165 UNDER
1.1 MI S JCT US 62, Muskogee, OK
Over: S.H. 165 UNDER
1.1 MI S JCT US 62, Muskogee, OK
Over: SOUTH FORK TRIB.
8.7 MI N C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: SHIMOON CREEK
21.4 MI N C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: COODY CREEK
14.1 MI NE C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: GEORGES FORK TRIB.
10.1 MI N C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: COODY CREEK
1.5 MI S JCT US 62B, Muskogee, OK
Over: HYDE PARK CREEK
1.0 MI N OF US 62, Muskogee, OK
Over: COATA CREEK
1.0 MI E US 64 BUS, Muskogee, OK
Over: CREEK
2.6 MI E JCT US 69, Muskogee, OK
Over: GEORGES FORK CREEK
3.4 MI E JCT SH 2, Muskogee, OK
Over: SAND CREEK
10.1 MI N C/L, Muskogee, OK
Over: COAL CREEK
1.2 MI E JCT US 64, Muskogee, OK
Over: CREEK
5.4 MI E JCT SH 16, Muskogee, OK
Over: CREEK
2.6 MI N JCT US 62, Muskogee, OK
Over: CREEK
2.7 MI N JCT US 62, Muskogee, OK
Over: C.C. CREEK
2.9 MI E US 64, Muskogee, OK
Over: MANARD BAYOU TRIB.
10.9 MI E JCT SH 16, Muskogee, OK
Over: RAYNE CREEK
11.8 MI E JCT SH 16, Muskogee, OK
Over: CREEK
3.4N JCT I-40/S.H. 2, Muskogee, OK
Over: CREEK
.3N .5W OF US 69, Muskogee, OK
Over: CREEK
11.4 MI S JCT US 62B, Muskogee, OK
Over: CREEK
17.4 MI S JCT US 62, Muskogee, OK
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.