Total bridges
152
Public highway bridges in Beadle County
County profile · official public datasets
152 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 19.1% rated Good, 47.4% Fair, 33.6% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Beadle County pairs a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with an older average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Beadle County ranks #65 of 66 South Dakota counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 33.6%). Beadle County, South Dakota contains 152 public highway bridges. Roughly 19.1% are rated “Good,” 47.4% “Fair,” and 33.6% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
152
Public highway bridges in Beadle County
Good condition
19.1%
29 of 152 rated 7-9
Fair condition
47.4%
72 of 152 rated 5-6
Poor condition
33.6%
51 of 152 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#65 of 66
Among South Dakota counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 152 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 12% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 33.6% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 137 crossings a day against 156 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 152 of 152 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
109 of the 152 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 19.1% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
US014 over JAMES RV, built 1960, carries 3,619 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 51-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 7,007 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
152 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1900–1909
2 bridges
1910–1919
5 bridges
1920–1929
27 bridges
1930–1939
37 bridges
1940–1949
10 bridges
1950–1959
9 bridges
1960–1969
14 bridges
1970–1979
12 bridges
1980–1989
11 bridges
1990–1999
5 bridges
2000–2009
9 bridges
2010–2019
7 bridges
2020–2029
4 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1930s, when 37 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 24.3% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 85 to 94 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1955, 20 years older than the South Dakota average of 1975.
The 5 South Dakota counties nearest Beadle County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 33.6% Poor share is the 6th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1955 against a peer-group mean of 1977 is 22 years older.
Showing the 5 closest of 65 South Dakota counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hutchinson County | 161 | 32.9% | 50.9% | 16.1% | 1974 |
| Roberts County | 157 | 22.9% | 52.9% | 24.2% | 1970 |
| Beadle County (this page) | 152 | 19.1% | 47.4% | 33.6% | 1955 |
| Butte County | 143 | 30.8% | 57.3% | 11.9% | 1976 |
| Turner County | 143 | 38.5% | 35.7% | 25.9% | 1984 |
| Lawrence County | 136 | 36% | 51.5% | 12.5% | 1980 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Beadle County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Beadle County, both outside South Dakota so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside SD (152 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside SD (1955 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: STONY RUN CK
SW CORNER OF HURON, Beadle, SD
Over: Cain Creek
8.6S & 5W of Huron, Beadle, SD
Over: SOUTH FORK PEARL CK
8.0S 1.5W CAVOUR, Beadle, SD
Over: SHUE CK
8N 0.8E CAVOUR, Beadle, SD
Over: Middle Pearl Creek
5.1S & 3E of Cavour, Beadle, SD
Over: Sand Creek
3.5W & 4.5S of Virgil, Beadle, SD
Over: CAIN CK
3N VIRGIL, Beadle, SD
Over: Middle Pearl Creek
4S & 3.8W of Iroquois, Beadle, SD
Over: PEARL CK
7.6S 2W CAVOUR, Beadle, SD
Over: Cain Creek
4.0N & 1.9W of Wolsey, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
9.7W & 12S of Wolsey, Beadle, SD
Over: S. Fork of Pearl Creek
0.6W & 3.0S of Iroquois, Beadle, SD
Over: S. Fork of Pearl Creek
9.4S of Cavour, Beadle, SD
Over: Pearl Creek
1E & 2.8S of Cavour, Beadle, SD
Over: S. Fork of Pearl Creek
4S & 0.9W of Iroquois, Beadle, SD
Over: Shue Creek
14N 6.2W Iroquois, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
16N & 4.8W of Iroquois, Beadle, SD
Over: Pearl Creak
4.8S of Cavour, Beadle, SD
Over: Pearl Creek
1.9N & 2E of Yale, Beadle, SD
Over: Cain Creek
4.5N & 4.0W of Wolsey, Beadle, SD
Over: Unnamed Creek
5.5E & 2N of Huron, Beadle, SD
Over: Middle Pearl Creek
5.2S & 4E of Cavour, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
2.5W & 2N of Broadland, Beadle, SD
Over: Turtle Creek
11N & 2.9E of Wessington, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
9N & 3.8E of Wessington, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
12.8S & 6W of Wolsey, Beadle, SD
Over: Unnamed Creek
0.8W & 3S of Bloomfield, Beadle, SD
Over: Shue Creek
7N 0.9E Cavour, Beadle, SD
Over: Middle Pearl Creek
5.1S & 2E of Cavour, Beadle, SD
Over: Pearl Creek
5N & 4.9W of Iroquois, Beadle, SD
Over: Cain Creek
2E & 0.4S of Wessington, Beadle, SD
Over: S. Fork of Pearl Creek
2.9E & 9S of Cavour, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
4.5S & 8.3W of Virgil, Beadle, SD
Over: Silver Creek
12.2W of Virgil, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
6.5S of Wolsey, Beadle, SD
Over: Cain Creek
4.0N & 3.9W of Wolsey, Beadle, SD
Over: Cain Creek
1S & 1.3E of Wolsey, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
SW Edge of Broadland, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
16N & 3.9W of Iroquois, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
11S & 2.5W of Iroquois, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
7S & 0.3W of Iroquois, Beadle, SD
Over: Cain Creek
2.5E & 1.6S of Virgil, Beadle, SD
Over: Ravine Park Lake
1N & 0.3E of Huron, Beadle, SD
Over: Sand Creek
1.5N of 11.9W of Virgil, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
11.2N of 2E of Wessington, Beadle, SD
Over: Cain Creek
4W & 6.7N of Wolsey, Beadle, SD
Over: Sand Creek
5.5W & 2.7S of Virgil, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
0.5S of Broadland, Beadle, SD
Over: Broadland Creek
2.5S & 1.9E of Broadland, Beadle, SD
Over: Creek
4S & 1.8W of Huron, Beadle, SD
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.