Total bridges
331
Public highway bridges in Hickman County
County profile · official public datasets
331 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 38.7% rated Good, 56.2% Fair, 5.1% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Hickman County posts a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Hickman County ranks #69 of 95 Tennessee counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 5.1%). Hickman County, Tennessee contains 331 public highway bridges. Roughly 38.7% are rated “Good,” 56.2% “Fair,” and 5.1% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
331
Public highway bridges in Hickman County
Good condition
38.7%
128 of 331 rated 7-9
Fair condition
56.2%
186 of 331 rated 5-6
Poor condition
5.1%
17 of 331 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#69 of 95
Among Tennessee counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 331 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0.7% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 5.1% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 358 crossings a day against 927 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 331 of 331 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
122 of the 331 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 38.7% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
FAS 50 over DUCK RIVER, built 1970, carries 3,281 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 17-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 6,088 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
331 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1930–1939
15 bridges
1950–1959
17 bridges
1960–1969
65 bridges
1970–1979
74 bridges
1980–1989
68 bridges
1990–1999
54 bridges
2000–2009
19 bridges
2010–2019
16 bridges
2020–2029
3 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1970s, when 74 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 22.4% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 45 to 54 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1979) matches the Tennessee average (1977).
The 5 Tennessee counties nearest Hickman County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 5.1% Poor share is the 5th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1979 against a peer-group mean of 1977 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 94 Tennessee counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weakley County | 351 | 43.3% | 55.6% | 1.1% | 1987 |
| Fayette County | 336 | 23.8% | 68.8% | 7.4% | 1984 |
| Hickman County (this page) | 331 | 38.7% | 56.2% | 5.1% | 1979 |
| Giles County | 321 | 56.1% | 41.7% | 2.2% | 1968 |
| Greene County | 306 | 30.4% | 67% | 2.6% | 1974 |
| Lincoln County | 304 | 52.6% | 44.4% | 3% | 1974 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Hickman County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Hickman County, both outside Tennessee so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside TN (331 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside TN (1979 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: LITTLE SPRING CREEK
4.8 M NE OF NUNNELLY, Hickman, TN
Over: PERSIMMON CREEK
MADDOX RD., Hickman, TN
Over: BLUE BUCK CREEK
7 M W OF SHADY GROVE, Hickman, TN
Over: FALLS BRANCH
4.67 M SE OF NFA 955, Hickman, TN
Over: FALLS BRANCH
5.03 M SE OF NFA 955, Hickman, TN
Over: SHORT BRANCH
6 M SE OF CENTERVILLE, Hickman, TN
Over: BRUSHY FORK CREEK
3 M E HORNERTOWN, Hickman, TN
Over: MILAN BRANCH
5 M SW OF CENTERVILLE, Hickman, TN
Over: PETERS BRANCH
3 M N OF HORNERTOWN, Hickman, TN
Over: WEST FORK DEFEATED CREEK
1.8 M NE OF CENTERVILLE, Hickman, TN
Over: DUCK RIVER OVERFLOW
.3 M SE JCT I40&PERRY CL, Hickman, TN
Over: PRETTY CREEK
4.5 M NW OF NUNNELLY, Hickman, TN
Over: WEST FORK WOLF CREEK
4 M SOUTH OF ONLY, Hickman, TN
Over: WEST FORK WOLF CREEK
4 M SOUTH OF ONLY, Hickman, TN
Over: SUGAR CREEK
2.5 M NE OF ONLY, Hickman, TN
Over: BRANCH
5 MILES NORTH OF NUNNELLY, Hickman, TN
Over: SWAN CREEK
5.5 M SOUTH CENTERVILLE, Hickman, TN
Over: MILAM BRANCH
3 M NW SR 48 & SR 100, Hickman, TN
Over: GARNER CREEK
YATES LANE, Hickman, TN
Over: BRANCH
NORTH OF I-40, Hickman, TN
Over: DUCK RIVER
1 M NE PERRY CO LINE, Hickman, TN
Over: DUCK RIVER
1 M NE PERRY CO LINE, Hickman, TN
Over: SUGAR CREEK
3.3 M NE PERRY CO LINE, Hickman, TN
Over: SUGAR CREEK
3.3 M NE PERRY CO LINE, Hickman, TN
Over: SUGAR CREEK
4 M NE PERRY CO LINE, Hickman, TN
Over: NFA A368 & SUGAR CREEK
.3 M NE OF SR230, Hickman, TN
Over: GARNER CREEK
1 MI.SW OF DICKSON CO., Hickman, TN
Over: GARNER CREEK
1 MI.SW OF DICKSON CO., Hickman, TN
Over: SUGAR CREEK
4 M NE OF ONLY, Hickman, TN
Over: BRANCH
3 M EAST OF PINEWOOD, Hickman, TN
Over: LEATHERWOOD CREEK
3 M NORTH OF SHADY GROVE, Hickman, TN
Over: BRANCH
3 M SE OF PLEASANTVILLE, Hickman, TN
Over: GIN BRANCH
6.8 M SE OF SR 100, Hickman, TN
Over: GIN BRANCH
5.9 M SE OF SR 100, Hickman, TN
Over: DEFEATED CAMP CREEK
IN CENTERVILLE CITY LIMIT, Hickman, TN
Over: OVERFLOW DUCK RIVER
IN CENTERVILLE CITY LIMIT, Hickman, TN
Over: INDIAN CREEK
IN CENTERVILLE CITY LIMIT, Hickman, TN
Over: BOAT BRANCH
1.6 MI.NW.OF SHADY GROVE, Hickman, TN
Over: BRIAR POND BRANCH
SE OF ONLY TN, Hickman, TN
Over: BEAVERDAM CREEK OVERFLOW
SE OF ONLY TN, Hickman, TN
Over: BRANCH
SR50-EAST OF TURNEY CTR, Hickman, TN
Over: BEAVERDAM CREEK
.1MILE SOUTWEST 0F SR048, Hickman, TN
Over: MILL CREEK
.2 MI.SOUTH OF WRIGLEY, Hickman, TN
Over: LOCUS FORK CREEK
7 M. E. WRIGLEY, Hickman, TN
Over: JONES CREEK
2 M. NW. PRIMM SPRINGS, Hickman, TN
Over: BRANCH
4 M N OF CENTERVILLE, Hickman, TN
Over: NORTH FORK SUGAR CREEK
7 M W OF PINEWOOD, Hickman, TN
Over: MIDDLE FORK SUGAR CREEK
7 M EAST OF PINEWOOD, Hickman, TN
Over: TAYLOR CREEK
7.5 M NW OF CENTERVILLE, Hickman, TN
Over: PRETTY CREEK
4 M W OF PINEWOOD, Hickman, TN
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.