SC 768 CON
Carrying SC 768 CON over REEDER POINT BRANCH
5 MI SE OF COLUMBIA, Richland, South Carolina
Data updated May 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
Bridge Snapshot: SC 768 CON
The SC 768 CON bridge in Richland, South Carolina carries SC 768 CON over REEDER POINT BRANCH. It was built in 2019, making it 7 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 2 sections, stretching 32.0 meters (105 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 225 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of South Carolina bridges. It is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.
The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 8/9. The weakest component sits in good condition. None of this bridge's reported major components fall into the Poor condition range. Its NBI inventory load rating is 79.7 metric tons.
Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.
How SC 768 CON compares
Live comparison across South Carolina.
Historical Sufficiency Rating
PlainBridge-computedFHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 2019
- Material
- Concrete
- Number of Spans
- 2
- Structure Length
- 32.0 m (105 ft)
- Deck Width
- 32.9 m (108 ft)
- Owner
- State Highway Agency
- Avg Daily Traffic
- 225 vehicles/day
- Structure Number
- 000000000010200
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗How to read this record
This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether SC 768 CON is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
- Compare SC 768 CON against other structures in Richland and across South Carolina. South Carolina bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for SC 768 CON?
SC 768 CON in Richland, South Carolina on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is SC 768 CON inspected?
SC 768 CON's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 225 vehicles per day.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. SC 768 CON is currently shown as Good condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for SC 768 CON?
SC 768 CON has an NBI inventory load rating of 79.7 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining SC 768 CON?
SC 768 CON is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.
How old is SC 768 CON and does age affect safety?
SC 768 CON was built in 2019, making it 7 years old.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.