FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

RT 50 RAMP ON I81N

Carrying RT 50 RAMP ON I81N over ABRAMS CREEK & PRIVAT RD

0.40 TO 50 - 0.10 TO I81N, Frederick, Virginia

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: RT 50 RAMP ON I81N

The RT 50 RAMP ON I81N bridge in Frederick, Virginia carries RT 50 RAMP ON I81N over ABRAMS CREEK & PRIVAT RD. It does not have a recorded construction year in the NBI. Daily traffic averages 50 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Virginia bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How RT 50 RAMP ON I81N compares

168
Bridges in Frederick · 4 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Virginia.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
92.6 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
28.0
Essentiality /15
9.6
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Avg Daily Traffic
50 vehicles/day
Structure Number
000000000028783

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether RT 50 RAMP ON I81N is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare RT 50 RAMP ON I81N against other structures in Frederick and across Virginia. Virginia bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for RT 50 RAMP ON I81N?

RT 50 RAMP ON I81N in Frederick, Virginia on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is RT 50 RAMP ON I81N inspected?

RT 50 RAMP ON I81N's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 50 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. RT 50 RAMP ON I81N is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for RT 50 RAMP ON I81N?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for RT 50 RAMP ON I81N.

Who is responsible for maintaining RT 50 RAMP ON I81N?

Ownership is not specified for RT 50 RAMP ON I81N in the NBI.

How old is RT 50 RAMP ON I81N and does age affect safety?

The construction year for RT 50 RAMP ON I81N is not recorded in the NBI.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.