FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

SH 183 Log 2.93

Carrying SH 183 Log 2.93 over ALCOA PLANT PVT. RD.

3 MI E JCT SH 35 & 183, Saline, Arkansas

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: SH 183 Log 2.93

The SH 183 Log 2.93 bridge in Saline, Arkansas carries SH 183 Log 2.93 over ALCOA PLANT PVT. RD.. It does not have a recorded construction year in the NBI. Daily traffic averages 100 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Arkansas bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How SH 183 Log 2.93 compares

76
Bridges in Saline · 2 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Arkansas.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
72.6 / 100 - historical 50–79.9 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
9.0
Essentiality /15
11.6
Special reductions
−3.0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Avg Daily Traffic
100 vehicles/day
Structure Number
0000000000M2246

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether SH 183 Log 2.93 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare SH 183 Log 2.93 against other structures in Saline and across Arkansas. Arkansas bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for SH 183 Log 2.93?

SH 183 Log 2.93 in Saline, Arkansas on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is SH 183 Log 2.93 inspected?

SH 183 Log 2.93's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 100 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. SH 183 Log 2.93 is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for SH 183 Log 2.93?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for SH 183 Log 2.93.

Who is responsible for maintaining SH 183 Log 2.93?

Ownership is not specified for SH 183 Log 2.93 in the NBI.

How old is SH 183 Log 2.93 and does age affect safety?

The construction year for SH 183 Log 2.93 is not recorded in the NBI.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.