US 63-06- LM 2.24
Carrying US 63-06- LM 2.24 over GUM SLOUGH RELIEF
2.24Mi SW Green Co Line, Craighead, Arkansas
Data updated May 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
Bridge Snapshot: US 63-06- LM 2.24
The US 63-06- LM 2.24 bridge in Craighead, Arkansas carries US 63-06- LM 2.24 over GUM SLOUGH RELIEF. It was built in 2003, making it 23 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 5 sections, stretching 16.2 meters (53 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 12,699 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of Arkansas bridges. It is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.
The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 7/9. The weakest component sits in good condition. None of this bridge's reported major components fall into the Poor condition range. Its NBI inventory load rating is 21.8 metric tons.
Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.
How US 63-06- LM 2.24 compares
Live comparison across Arkansas.
Historical Sufficiency Rating
PlainBridge-computedFHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 2003
- Material
- Concrete
- Number of Spans
- 5
- Structure Length
- 16.2 m (53 ft)
- Owner
- State Highway Agency
- Avg Daily Traffic
- 12,699 vehicles/day
- Structure Number
- 0000000000X1116
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗How to read this record
This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether US 63-06- LM 2.24 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
- Compare US 63-06- LM 2.24 against other structures in Craighead and across Arkansas. Arkansas bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for US 63-06- LM 2.24?
US 63-06- LM 2.24 in Craighead, Arkansas on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is US 63-06- LM 2.24 inspected?
US 63-06- LM 2.24's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 12,699 vehicles per day.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. US 63-06- LM 2.24 is currently shown as Good condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for US 63-06- LM 2.24?
US 63-06- LM 2.24 has an NBI inventory load rating of 21.8 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining US 63-06- LM 2.24?
US 63-06- LM 2.24 is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.
How old is US 63-06- LM 2.24 and does age affect safety?
US 63-06- LM 2.24 was built in 2003, making it 23 years old.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.