FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

RTE 386

Carrying RTE 386 over 531 531 43011011, RTE 53

RTE 386 OVER 490I - GATES, Monroe, New York

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: RTE 386

The RTE 386 bridge in Monroe, New York carries RTE 386 over 531 531 43011011, RTE 53. It was built in 1986, making it 40 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel continuous. Daily traffic averages 18,854 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of New York bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How RTE 386 compares

685
Bridges in Monroe · 31 in Poor condition

Live comparison across New York.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
73.0 / 100 - historical 50–79.9 band
Structural adequacy /55
45.0
Serviceability /30
13.0
Essentiality /15
15.0
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1986
Material
Steel Continuous
Avg Daily Traffic
18,854 vehicles/day
Structure Number
000000001073170

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether RTE 386 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare RTE 386 against other structures in Monroe and across New York. New York bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for RTE 386?

RTE 386 in Monroe, New York on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is RTE 386 inspected?

RTE 386's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 18,854 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. RTE 386 is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for RTE 386?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for RTE 386.

Who is responsible for maintaining RTE 386?

Ownership is not specified for RTE 386 in the NBI.

How old is RTE 386 and does age affect safety?

RTE 386 was built in 1986, making it 40 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.