FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

RTE 790

Carrying RTE 790 over 5S 5S 26011000, Ramp to

Jct Rts 5A, 5S, 5 Utica, Oneida, New York

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: RTE 790

The RTE 790 bridge in Oneida, New York carries RTE 790 over 5S 5S 26011000, Ramp to. It was built in 2017, making it 9 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel continuous. Daily traffic averages 24,000 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of New York bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How RTE 790 compares

509
Bridges in Oneida · 54 in Poor condition

Live comparison across New York.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
92.9 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
26.0
Essentiality /15
11.9
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
2017
Material
Steel Continuous
Avg Daily Traffic
24,000 vehicles/day
Structure Number
000000001079550

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether RTE 790 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare RTE 790 against other structures in Oneida and across New York. New York bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for RTE 790?

RTE 790 in Oneida, New York on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is RTE 790 inspected?

RTE 790's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 24,000 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. RTE 790 is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for RTE 790?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for RTE 790.

Who is responsible for maintaining RTE 790?

Ownership is not specified for RTE 790 in the NBI.

How old is RTE 790 and does age affect safety?

RTE 790 was built in 2017, making it 9 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.