FHWA NBI 2026 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

SR2407

Carrying SR2407 over BRANCH SANDY CREEK

75 FT. W. JCT. SR 2441, Randolph, North Carolina

FHWA NBI inspection record for this structure. Condition ratings, inventory load rating, span, deck width, and average daily traffic refresh annually with each NBI release.

Good
38 t Inventory load rating

Bridge Snapshot: SR2407

The SR2407 bridge in Randolph, North Carolina carries SR2407 over BRANCH SANDY CREEK. It was built in 2018, making it 8 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete continuous and spans 3 sections, stretching 10.0 meters (33 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 540 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of North Carolina bridges. It is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency, the entity responsible for routine inspections and any needed repairs.

The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 7/9 on the 0–9 NBI scale, where 9 is excellent and 0 is failed. The weakest component sits in good condition, which drives the overall status of this bridge. No major component scores in the poor range, so the bridge is not classified as structurally deficient under federal criteria. Its NBI inventory load rating is 38.1 metric tons — the load level the structure is rated to carry at inventory (long-term) level.

In a county that maintains hundreds of NBI-tracked bridges, SR2407 is one data point in a North Carolina inventory that FHWA inspects on a two-year cycle (more often when ratings fall). Bridge age alone is not a reliable safety signal — a 8-era structure can outperform a newer one when maintenance is consistent, materials are sound, and traffic loads stay within design limits. Use the condition ratings above, the inventory load rating, and the structurally-deficient flag together to read the bridge's real status, and check the linked county and state pages to see how this bridge ranks against its peers.

Every figure on this page comes directly from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory (NBI), the public dataset that catalogs more than 575,000 highway bridges across the United States and is updated annually from the records that each state Department of Transportation submits to the FHWA. The condition codes use the standardized FHWA Recording and Coding Guide, the same scale that determines federal eligibility for the Highway Bridge Program and the Surface Transportation Block Grant set-aside for off-system bridges. A "structurally deficient" classification under those federal criteria is a maintenance and funding flag, never a closure order; states keep deficient bridges open with load posting, weight limits, or accelerated inspection cycles until rehabilitation or replacement is funded. See our methodology for refresh cadence and the exact NBI release vintage powering each record.

How SR2407 compares

▼ 6.1
Load rating vs North Carolina average (44.2 t)
Bottom 43%
Lower load rating than 57% of North Carolina bridges
401
Bridges in Randolph · 5 structurally deficient
SR2407 38.1 t
North Carolina average 44.2 t

NBI inventory load rating (metric tons) and structural-deficiency status compared across North Carolina, computed live from the FHWA NBI.

Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
99.9 / 100 — Sufficient
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
30.0
Essentiality /15
14.9
Special reductions
0

Computed by PlainBridge from the published FHWA NBI items using the agency's historical sufficiency-rating formula (Recording & Coding Guide, Appendix B). The FHWA itself no longer publishes this composite — see how it is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Culvert
7/9
Good (7–9)
Inventory Load Rating
38.1 t
NBI inventory level (metric tons)
SD Status
Not SD

Ratings are on a 0–9 scale: 9 = Excellent, 7–8 = Good, 5–6 = Fair, 3–4 = Poor, 0–2 = Critical/Failed. Sufficiency rating (0–100) combines structural adequacy, functional obsolescence, and essentiality.

Structural Details

Year Built
2018
Material
Concrete Continuous
Number of Spans
3
Structure Length
10.0 m (33 ft)
Owner
State Highway Agency
Avg Daily Traffic
540 vehicles/day
Structure Number
000000001510129

Location

75 FT. W. JCT. SR 2441, Randolph, North Carolina
35.864981, -79.616178
View on Google Maps ↗

Data Source

Data from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI). Bridge inspections are required every two years by federal law. Conditions reflect the most recent inspection.

FHWA NBI Program ↗

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded — not whether SR2407 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the most recent inspection, which can be up to 24 months old — treat them as a snapshot, not a live status.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and the structurally-deficient flag are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare SR2407 against other structures in Randolph and across North Carolina. North Carolina bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge — or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency — a state DOT, county, or other owner — can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for SR2407?

Bridge condition ratings use a 0–9 scale set by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Ratings 7–9 indicate good condition with no significant problems. Ratings 5–6 mean fair condition with minor issues. Ratings 3–4 indicate poor condition requiring repair. Ratings 0–2 are critical, meaning the bridge has serious structural problems. SR2407 in Randolph, North Carolina.

How often is SR2407 inspected?

Federal law requires most highway bridges to be inspected at least every 24 months. Bridges in poor condition or with known issues may be inspected more frequently (every 12 months or less). SR2407 is part of the National Bridge Inventory maintained by the FHWA. With 540 vehicles crossing daily, regular inspection is essential.

What does "structurally deficient" mean for a bridge?

A structurally deficient bridge has at least one major component (deck, superstructure, or substructure) rated 4 or below on the FHWA 0–9 scale. This classification does NOT mean the bridge is unsafe for travel — it means the bridge needs repair, rehabilitation, or eventual replacement. Structurally deficient bridges remain open and are monitored. SR2407 is not classified as structurally deficient.

What is the inventory load rating for SR2407?

The NBI inventory rating is the load level a bridge is rated to carry for an indefinite period, recorded in metric tons. A lower number means the structure is more load-restricted. SR2407 has an inventory load rating of 38.1 metric tons. It is distinct from the FHWA sufficiency rating, a separate 0–100 funding-eligibility score that this dataset does not include.

Who is responsible for maintaining SR2407?

Bridge ownership and maintenance responsibility varies — bridges may be owned by state DOTs, counties, cities, railroads, or federal agencies. SR2407 is maintained by State Highway Agency. The FHWA oversees the National Bridge Inventory program and sets inspection standards, but day-to-day maintenance falls to the owning agency. If you notice damage or safety concerns, contact your state DOT or call 911 for emergencies.

How old is SR2407 and does age affect safety?

SR2407 was built in 2018, making it 8 years old. Bridge age alone does not determine safety — condition depends on materials, design, traffic load, maintenance history, and environmental exposure. Many older bridges remain in good condition due to regular maintenance and reconstruction.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A structurally deficient rating does not mean a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel — it indicates the bridge requires repair or replacement. For current closure or safety information, contact your state DOT.

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges Editorial