FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

NON-SYSTEM ROAD

Carrying NON-SYSTEM ROAD over S.F.NEW RVR & NON-SYSTEM

50 FT..W.JCT.SR1100, Watauga, North Carolina

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: NON-SYSTEM ROAD

The NON-SYSTEM ROAD bridge in Watauga, North Carolina carries NON-SYSTEM ROAD over S.F.NEW RVR & NON-SYSTEM. It was built in 2011, making it 15 years old today. The structure is built primarily of prestressed concrete. Daily traffic averages 40 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of North Carolina bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How NON-SYSTEM ROAD compares

200
Bridges in Watauga · 19 in Poor condition

Live comparison across North Carolina.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
95.9 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
26.0
Essentiality /15
14.9
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
2011
Material
Prestressed Concrete
Avg Daily Traffic
40 vehicles/day
Structure Number
000000001890334

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether NON-SYSTEM ROAD is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare NON-SYSTEM ROAD against other structures in Watauga and across North Carolina. North Carolina bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for NON-SYSTEM ROAD?

NON-SYSTEM ROAD in Watauga, North Carolina on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is NON-SYSTEM ROAD inspected?

NON-SYSTEM ROAD's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 40 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. NON-SYSTEM ROAD is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for NON-SYSTEM ROAD?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for NON-SYSTEM ROAD.

Who is responsible for maintaining NON-SYSTEM ROAD?

Ownership is not specified for NON-SYSTEM ROAD in the NBI.

How old is NON-SYSTEM ROAD and does age affect safety?

NON-SYSTEM ROAD was built in 2011, making it 15 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.