BET. NY 129 & ARCA
Carrying BET. NY 129 & ARCA over NEW CROTON RESERVOIR
4.6 MI NE CROTON ON HUDS., Westchester, New York
Data updated May 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
Bridge Snapshot: BET. NY 129 & ARCA
The BET. NY 129 & ARCA bridge in Westchester, New York carries BET. NY 129 & ARCA over NEW CROTON RESERVOIR. It was built in 1904, making it 122 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel and spans 1 section, stretching 163.1 meters (535 feet) end to end. Average daily traffic is not reported for this structure. It is owned and maintained by Other Local Agencies.
The latest FHWA inspection records show a deck rating of 5/9, superstructure at 4/9, substructure at 5/9. The weakest component sits in poor condition. Because at least one major component scores 4 or lower, this bridge falls in FHWA's Poor condition category. That category is not a closure order. Its NBI inventory load rating is 14.5 metric tons.
Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.
How BET. NY 129 & ARCA compares
Live comparison across New York.
Historical Sufficiency Rating
PlainBridge-computedFHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 1904
- Material
- Steel
- Number of Spans
- 1
- Structure Length
- 163.1 m (535 ft)
- Deck Width
- 6.8 m (22 ft)
- Owner
- Other Local Agencies
- Structure Number
- 000000002262070
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗Condition Analysis
- • The deck (driving surface) rates fair at 5/9, minor deterioration that routine maintenance should address.
- • At 4/9, the superstructure (beams and supports above the deck) is in poor shape, with advanced wear flagged for priority repair.
- • The substructure (piers and abutments) rates fair at 5/9, minor deterioration that routine maintenance should address.
How to read this record
BET. NY 129 & ARCA is in the federal Poor condition category. That is a component-based result, not a closure order.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Understand what Poor condition does and does not mean before drawing conclusions. Poor condition explained
- Compare BET. NY 129 & ARCA against other structures in Westchester and across New York. New York bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for BET. NY 129 & ARCA?
BET. NY 129 & ARCA in Westchester, New York has a deck rating of 5/9, superstructure rating of 4/9, and substructure rating of 5/9 on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is BET. NY 129 & ARCA inspected?
BET. NY 129 & ARCA's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. BET. NY 129 & ARCA is currently shown as Poor condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for BET. NY 129 & ARCA?
BET. NY 129 & ARCA has an NBI inventory load rating of 14.5 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining BET. NY 129 & ARCA?
BET. NY 129 & ARCA is owned and maintained by Other Local Agencies.
How old is BET. NY 129 & ARCA and does age affect safety?
BET. NY 129 & ARCA was built in 1904, making it 122 years old.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.