FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

S TACOMA WAY

Carrying S TACOMA WAY over I-5, RAMP

12.1 N THURSTON CO, Pierce, Washington

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: S TACOMA WAY

The S TACOMA WAY bridge in Pierce, Washington carries S TACOMA WAY over I-5, RAMP. It was built in 1958, making it 68 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete continuous. Daily traffic averages 108,065 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of Washington bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How S TACOMA WAY compares

502
Bridges in Pierce · 18 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Washington.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
64.8 / 100 - historical 50–79.9 band
Structural adequacy /55
45.6
Serviceability /30
8.0
Essentiality /15
11.2
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1958
Material
Concrete Continuous
Avg Daily Traffic
108,065 vehicles/day
Structure Number
0005651A0000000

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether S TACOMA WAY is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare S TACOMA WAY against other structures in Pierce and across Washington. Washington bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for S TACOMA WAY?

S TACOMA WAY in Pierce, Washington on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is S TACOMA WAY inspected?

S TACOMA WAY's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 108,065 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. S TACOMA WAY is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for S TACOMA WAY?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for S TACOMA WAY.

Who is responsible for maintaining S TACOMA WAY?

Ownership is not specified for S TACOMA WAY in the NBI.

How old is S TACOMA WAY and does age affect safety?

S TACOMA WAY was built in 1958, making it 68 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.