FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

NE 72ND PLACE

Carrying NE 72ND PLACE over I-405

2.6 N JCT SR 520, King, Washington

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: NE 72ND PLACE

The NE 72ND PLACE bridge in King, Washington carries NE 72ND PLACE over I-405. It was built in 1970, making it 56 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete continuous. Daily traffic averages 164,679 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of Washington bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How NE 72ND PLACE compares

1,364
Bridges in King · 45 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Washington.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
76.7 / 100 - historical 50–79.9 band
Structural adequacy /55
54.7
Serviceability /30
9.0
Essentiality /15
15.0
Special reductions
−2.0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1970
Material
Concrete Continuous
Avg Daily Traffic
164,679 vehicles/day
Structure Number
0008674A0000000

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether NE 72ND PLACE is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare NE 72ND PLACE against other structures in King and across Washington. Washington bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for NE 72ND PLACE?

NE 72ND PLACE in King, Washington on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is NE 72ND PLACE inspected?

NE 72ND PLACE's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 164,679 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. NE 72ND PLACE is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for NE 72ND PLACE?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for NE 72ND PLACE.

Who is responsible for maintaining NE 72ND PLACE?

Ownership is not specified for NE 72ND PLACE in the NBI.

How old is NE 72ND PLACE and does age affect safety?

NE 72ND PLACE was built in 1970, making it 56 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.