FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

SE 312TH WAY

Carrying SE 312TH WAY over SR 18

3.8 E JCT SR 164, King, Washington

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: SE 312TH WAY

The SE 312TH WAY bridge in King, Washington carries SE 312TH WAY over SR 18. It was built in 1997, making it 29 years old today. The structure is built primarily of prestressed concrete continuous. Daily traffic averages 54,920 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of Washington bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How SE 312TH WAY compares

1,364
Bridges in King · 45 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Washington.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
98.0 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
28.0
Essentiality /15
15.0
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1997
Material
Prestressed Concrete Continuous
Avg Daily Traffic
54,920 vehicles/day
Structure Number
0014776G0000000

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether SE 312TH WAY is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare SE 312TH WAY against other structures in King and across Washington. Washington bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for SE 312TH WAY?

SE 312TH WAY in King, Washington on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is SE 312TH WAY inspected?

SE 312TH WAY's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 54,920 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. SE 312TH WAY is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for SE 312TH WAY?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for SE 312TH WAY.

Who is responsible for maintaining SE 312TH WAY?

Ownership is not specified for SE 312TH WAY in the NBI.

How old is SE 312TH WAY and does age affect safety?

SE 312TH WAY was built in 1997, making it 29 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.