6000 W.ST.,CO.RD.
Carrying 6000 W.ST.,CO.RD. over WEST CANAL
14900 N. 6000 W., GARLAND, Box Elder, Utah
Data updated May 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
Bridge Snapshot: 6000 W.ST.,CO.RD.
The 6000 W.ST.,CO.RD. bridge in Box Elder, Utah carries 6000 W.ST.,CO.RD. over WEST CANAL. It was built in 1988, making it 38 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 1 section, stretching 9.7 meters (32 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 630 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Utah bridges. It is owned and maintained by County Highway Agency.
The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 5/9. The weakest component sits in fair condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds. Its NBI inventory load rating is 19.4 metric tons.
Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.
How 6000 W.ST.,CO.RD. compares
Live comparison across Utah.
Historical Sufficiency Rating
PlainBridge-computedFHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 1988
- Material
- Concrete
- Number of Spans
- 1
- Structure Length
- 9.7 m (32 ft)
- Deck Width
- 9.1 m (30 ft)
- Owner
- County Highway Agency
- Avg Daily Traffic
- 630 vehicles/day
- Structure Number
- 003015D
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗How to read this record
This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether 6000 W.ST.,CO.RD. is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
- Compare 6000 W.ST.,CO.RD. against other structures in Box Elder and across Utah. Utah bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for 6000 W.ST.,CO.RD.?
6000 W.ST.,CO.RD. in Box Elder, Utah on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is 6000 W.ST.,CO.RD. inspected?
6000 W.ST.,CO.RD.'s responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 630 vehicles per day.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. 6000 W.ST.,CO.RD. is currently shown as Fair condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for 6000 W.ST.,CO.RD.?
6000 W.ST.,CO.RD. has an NBI inventory load rating of 19.4 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining 6000 W.ST.,CO.RD.?
6000 W.ST.,CO.RD. is owned and maintained by County Highway Agency.
How old is 6000 W.ST.,CO.RD. and does age affect safety?
6000 W.ST.,CO.RD. was built in 1988, making it 38 years old.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.