FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

Redrock Rd

Carrying Redrock Rd over I 10; EB & WB

15.5 mi S Jct SR 84, Pinal, Arizona

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: Redrock Rd

The Redrock Rd bridge in Pinal, Arizona carries Redrock Rd over I 10; EB & WB. It was built in 1959, making it 67 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete continuous. Daily traffic averages 47,244 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of Arizona bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. None of this bridge's reported major components fall into the Poor condition range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How Redrock Rd compares

390
Bridges in Pinal · 6 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Arizona.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
72.9 / 100 - historical 50–79.9 band
Structural adequacy /55
45.0
Serviceability /30
14.1
Essentiality /15
13.8
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1959
Material
Concrete Continuous
Avg Daily Traffic
47,244 vehicles/day
Structure Number
00592

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether Redrock Rd is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare Redrock Rd against other structures in Pinal and across Arizona. Arizona bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for Redrock Rd?

Redrock Rd in Pinal, Arizona on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is Redrock Rd inspected?

Redrock Rd's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 47,244 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. Redrock Rd is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for Redrock Rd?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for Redrock Rd.

Who is responsible for maintaining Redrock Rd?

Ownership is not specified for Redrock Rd in the NBI.

How old is Redrock Rd and does age affect safety?

Redrock Rd was built in 1959, making it 67 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.