SR 153 MP 3.125
Carrying SR 153 MP 3.125 over POPLAR BRANCH
3.1 MI. NORTH FLA. LINE., Geneva, Alabama
Data updated May 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
Bridge Snapshot: SR 153 MP 3.125
The SR 153 MP 3.125 bridge in Geneva, Alabama carries SR 153 MP 3.125 over POPLAR BRANCH. It was built in 1985, making it 41 years old today. It was last reconstructed in 1992, extending its service life. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 4 sections, stretching 7.9 meters (26 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 1,450 vehicles, placing it in the moderately-trafficked tier of Alabama bridges. It is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.
The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 7/9. The weakest component sits in good condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range. Its NBI inventory load rating is 32.7 metric tons.
Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.
How SR 153 MP 3.125 compares
Live comparison across Alabama.
Historical Sufficiency Rating
PlainBridge-computedFHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 1985
- Last Reconstructed
- 1992
- Material
- Concrete
- Number of Spans
- 4
- Structure Length
- 7.9 m (26 ft)
- Owner
- State Highway Agency
- Avg Daily Traffic
- 1,450 vehicles/day
- Structure Number
- 020822
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗How to read this record
This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether SR 153 MP 3.125 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
- Compare SR 153 MP 3.125 against other structures in Geneva and across Alabama. Alabama bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for SR 153 MP 3.125?
SR 153 MP 3.125 in Geneva, Alabama on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is SR 153 MP 3.125 inspected?
SR 153 MP 3.125's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 1,450 vehicles per day.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. SR 153 MP 3.125 is currently shown as Good condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for SR 153 MP 3.125?
SR 153 MP 3.125 has an NBI inventory load rating of 32.7 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining SR 153 MP 3.125?
SR 153 MP 3.125 is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.
How old is SR 153 MP 3.125 and does age affect safety?
SR 153 MP 3.125 was built in 1985, making it 41 years old and last reconstructed in 1992.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.