FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

SL 101 WB

Carrying SL 101 WB over 31st Avenue

22.69 mi N of Jct I 10, Maricopa, Arizona

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: SL 101 WB

The SL 101 WB bridge in Maricopa, Arizona carries SL 101 WB over 31st Avenue. It was built in 1992, making it 34 years old today. The structure is built primarily of prestressed concrete. Daily traffic averages 9,426 vehicles, placing it in the moderately-trafficked tier of Arizona bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. None of this bridge's reported major components fall into the Poor condition range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How SL 101 WB compares

2,203
Bridges in Maricopa · 3 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Arizona.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
96.3 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
30.0
Essentiality /15
11.3
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1992
Material
Prestressed Concrete
Avg Daily Traffic
9,426 vehicles/day
Structure Number
02135

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether SL 101 WB is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare SL 101 WB against other structures in Maricopa and across Arizona. Arizona bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for SL 101 WB?

SL 101 WB in Maricopa, Arizona on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is SL 101 WB inspected?

SL 101 WB's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 9,426 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. SL 101 WB is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for SL 101 WB?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for SL 101 WB.

Who is responsible for maintaining SL 101 WB?

Ownership is not specified for SL 101 WB in the NBI.

How old is SL 101 WB and does age affect safety?

SL 101 WB was built in 1992, making it 34 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.