FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

ROAD M1

Carrying ROAD M1 over EEL RIVER

13 MILES NE POTTER VALLEY, Lake, California

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Poor

Bridge Snapshot: ROAD M1

The ROAD M1 bridge in Lake, California carries ROAD M1 over EEL RIVER. It was built in 1971, making it 55 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 1 section, stretching 92.3 meters (303 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 350 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of California bridges. It is owned and maintained by U.S. Forest Service.

The latest FHWA inspection records show a deck rating of 7/9, superstructure at 3/9, substructure at 7/9. The weakest component sits in poor condition. At least one major component here scores 4 or below, which produces a Poor condition classification under FHWA's current reporting rules.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How ROAD M1 compares

129
Bridges in Lake · 10 in Poor condition

Live comparison across California.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
59.1 / 100 - historical 50–79.9 band
Structural adequacy /55
15.0
Serviceability /30
29.2
Essentiality /15
15.0
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Deck
7/9
Good (7–9)
Superstructure
3/9
Poor (1–4)
Substructure
7/9
Good (7–9)
Overall Condition
Poor

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1971
Material
Concrete
Number of Spans
1
Structure Length
92.3 m (303 ft)
Deck Width
9.7 m (32 ft)
Owner
U.S. Forest Service
Avg Daily Traffic
350 vehicles/day
Structure Number
050854000001001

Condition Analysis

  • The deck (driving surface) rates good at 7/9, with no significant deterioration on file.
  • At 3/9, the superstructure (beams and supports above the deck) is in poor shape, with advanced wear flagged for priority repair.
  • At 7/9, the substructure (piers and abutments) is in good shape and shows no significant wear.

How to read this record

ROAD M1 is in the federal Poor condition category. That is a component-based result, not a closure order.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Understand what Poor condition does and does not mean before drawing conclusions. Poor condition explained
  • Compare ROAD M1 against other structures in Lake and across California. California bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for ROAD M1?

ROAD M1 in Lake, California has a deck rating of 7/9, superstructure rating of 3/9, and substructure rating of 7/9 on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is ROAD M1 inspected?

ROAD M1's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 350 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. ROAD M1 is currently shown as Poor condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for ROAD M1?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for ROAD M1.

Who is responsible for maintaining ROAD M1?

ROAD M1 is owned and maintained by U.S. Forest Service.

How old is ROAD M1 and does age affect safety?

ROAD M1 was built in 1971, making it 55 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.