RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C
Carrying RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C over METLARS BROOK
adjacent to river road br, Middlesex, New Jersey
Data updated May 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
Bridge Snapshot: RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C
The RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C bridge in Middlesex, New Jersey carries RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C over METLARS BROOK. It was built in 2005, making it 21 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel continuous and spans 2 sections, stretching 102.4 meters (336 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 22,935 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of New Jersey bridges. It is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.
The latest FHWA inspection records show a deck rating of 7/9, superstructure at 8/9, substructure at 8/9. The weakest component sits in good condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds. Its NBI inventory load rating is 47.2 metric tons.
Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.
How RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C compares
Live comparison across New Jersey.
Historical Sufficiency Rating
PlainBridge-computedFHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 2005
- Material
- Steel Continuous
- Number of Spans
- 2
- Structure Length
- 102.4 m (336 ft)
- Deck Width
- 23.7 m (78 ft)
- Owner
- State Highway Agency
- Avg Daily Traffic
- 22,935 vehicles/day
- Structure Number
- 1237160
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗Condition Analysis
- • The deck (driving surface) rates good at 7/9, with no significant deterioration on file.
- • At 8/9, the superstructure (beams and supports above the deck) is in good shape and shows no significant wear.
- • The substructure (piers and abutments) rates good at 8/9, with no significant deterioration on file.
How to read this record
This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
- Compare RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C against other structures in Middlesex and across New Jersey. New Jersey bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C?
RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C in Middlesex, New Jersey has a deck rating of 7/9, superstructure rating of 8/9, and substructure rating of 8/9 on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C inspected?
RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 22,935 vehicles per day.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C is currently shown as Good condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C?
RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C has an NBI inventory load rating of 47.2 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C?
RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.
How old is RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C and does age affect safety?
RTE NJ 18 SB,RMP C was built in 2005, making it 21 years old.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.