FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD

Carrying MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD over I-80

1.06 MI E OF I-80 EXIT 35, Morris, New Jersey

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD

The MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD bridge in Morris, New Jersey carries MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD over I-80. It was built in 1958, making it 68 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel continuous. Daily traffic averages 154,324 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of New Jersey bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD compares

504
Bridges in Morris · 19 in Poor condition

Live comparison across New Jersey.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
76.6 / 100 - historical 50–79.9 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
10.0
Essentiality /15
13.6
Special reductions
−2.0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1958
Material
Steel Continuous
Avg Daily Traffic
154,324 vehicles/day
Structure Number
1413161

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD against other structures in Morris and across New Jersey. New Jersey bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD?

MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD in Morris, New Jersey on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD inspected?

MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 154,324 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD.

Who is responsible for maintaining MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD?

Ownership is not specified for MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD in the NBI.

How old is MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD and does age affect safety?

MT HOPE-ROCKAWY RD was built in 1958, making it 68 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.