FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

MSAS 126

Carrying MSAS 126 over I 35E; ON RAMP (NB)

0.4 N OF JCT 35E; CSAH28, Dakota, Minnesota

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: MSAS 126

The MSAS 126 bridge in Dakota, Minnesota carries MSAS 126 over I 35E; ON RAMP (NB). It was built in 2008, making it 18 years old today. The structure is built primarily of prestressed concrete. Daily traffic averages 1 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Minnesota bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How MSAS 126 compares

152
Bridges in Dakota · 1 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Minnesota.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
96.0 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
27.0
Essentiality /15
14.0
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
2008
Material
Prestressed Concrete
Avg Daily Traffic
1 vehicles/day
Structure Number
19562

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether MSAS 126 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare MSAS 126 against other structures in Dakota and across Minnesota. Minnesota bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for MSAS 126?

MSAS 126 in Dakota, Minnesota on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is MSAS 126 inspected?

MSAS 126's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 1 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. MSAS 126 is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for MSAS 126?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for MSAS 126.

Who is responsible for maintaining MSAS 126?

Ownership is not specified for MSAS 126 in the NBI.

How old is MSAS 126 and does age affect safety?

MSAS 126 was built in 2008, making it 18 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.