FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

OR62 (022I + D)

Carrying OR62 (022I + D) over Coker Butte Rd.

Hwy 022I MP 2.63, Jackson, Oregon

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: OR62 (022I + D)

The OR62 (022I + D) bridge in Jackson, Oregon carries OR62 (022I + D) over Coker Butte Rd.. It was built in 2018, making it 8 years old today. The structure is built primarily of prestressed concrete. Daily traffic averages 1,000 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Oregon bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How OR62 (022I + D) compares

401
Bridges in Jackson · 3 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Oregon.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
80.0 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
30.0
Essentiality /15
0.0
Special reductions
−5.0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
2018
Material
Prestressed Concrete
Avg Daily Traffic
1,000 vehicles/day
Structure Number
21643 022I00263

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether OR62 (022I + D) is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare OR62 (022I + D) against other structures in Jackson and across Oregon. Oregon bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for OR62 (022I + D)?

OR62 (022I + D) in Jackson, Oregon on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is OR62 (022I + D) inspected?

OR62 (022I + D)'s responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 1,000 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. OR62 (022I + D) is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for OR62 (022I + D)?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for OR62 (022I + D).

Who is responsible for maintaining OR62 (022I + D)?

Ownership is not specified for OR62 (022I + D) in the NBI.

How old is OR62 (022I + D) and does age affect safety?

OR62 (022I + D) was built in 2018, making it 8 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.