FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

CON 5129

Carrying CON 5129 over TH 100 SB

AT THE JCT TH 394; 100, Hennepin, Minnesota

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: CON 5129

The CON 5129 bridge in Hennepin, Minnesota carries CON 5129 over TH 100 SB. It was built in 1989, making it 37 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel continuous. Daily traffic averages 63,500 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of Minnesota bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How CON 5129 compares

980
Bridges in Hennepin · 28 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Minnesota.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
92.0 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
24.0
Essentiality /15
13.0
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1989
Material
Steel Continuous
Avg Daily Traffic
63,500 vehicles/day
Structure Number
27751A

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether CON 5129 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare CON 5129 against other structures in Hennepin and across Minnesota. Minnesota bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for CON 5129?

CON 5129 in Hennepin, Minnesota on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is CON 5129 inspected?

CON 5129's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 63,500 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. CON 5129 is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for CON 5129?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for CON 5129.

Who is responsible for maintaining CON 5129?

Ownership is not specified for CON 5129 in the NBI.

How old is CON 5129 and does age affect safety?

CON 5129 was built in 1989, making it 37 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.