FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

I15SBCD.Rp. toI80

Carrying I15SBCD.Rp. toI80 over 2250 SOUTH ST. & UPR

350 W. 2250 SO., SO. SL., Salt Lake, Utah

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: I15SBCD.Rp. toI80

The I15SBCD.Rp. toI80 bridge in Salt Lake, Utah carries I15SBCD.Rp. toI80 over 2250 SOUTH ST. & UPR. It was built in 1999, making it 27 years old today. The structure is built primarily of prestressed concrete. Average daily traffic is not reported for this structure.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How I15SBCD.Rp. toI80 compares

659
Bridges in Salt Lake · 18 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Utah.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
96.6 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
28.0
Essentiality /15
13.6
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1999
Material
Prestressed Concrete
Structure Number
3F 653

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether I15SBCD.Rp. toI80 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare I15SBCD.Rp. toI80 against other structures in Salt Lake and across Utah. Utah bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for I15SBCD.Rp. toI80?

I15SBCD.Rp. toI80 in Salt Lake, Utah on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is I15SBCD.Rp. toI80 inspected?

I15SBCD.Rp. toI80's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. I15SBCD.Rp. toI80 is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for I15SBCD.Rp. toI80?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for I15SBCD.Rp. toI80.

Who is responsible for maintaining I15SBCD.Rp. toI80?

Ownership is not specified for I15SBCD.Rp. toI80 in the NBI.

How old is I15SBCD.Rp. toI80 and does age affect safety?

I15SBCD.Rp. toI80 was built in 1999, making it 27 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.