FHWA NBI 2026 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

041 SF TAR HOLLOW

Carrying 041 SF TAR HOLLOW over HORSEMAN CAMP

TAR HOLLOW HORSE CAMP, Ross, Ohio

FHWA NBI inspection record for this structure. Condition ratings, inventory load rating, span, deck width, and average daily traffic refresh annually with each NBI release.

Poor
68 t Inventory load rating

Bridge Snapshot: 041 SF TAR HOLLOW

The 041 SF TAR HOLLOW bridge in Ross, Ohio carries 041 SF TAR HOLLOW over HORSEMAN CAMP. It was built in 1982, making it 44 years old today. It was last reconstructed in 2002, extending its service life. The structure is built primarily of steel and spans 1 section, stretching 7.3 meters (24 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 20 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Ohio bridges. It is owned and maintained by State Park/Forest/Reservation, the entity responsible for routine inspections and any needed repairs.

The latest FHWA inspection records show a deck rating of 4/9, superstructure at 7/9, substructure at 8/9 on the 0–9 NBI scale, where 9 is excellent and 0 is failed. The weakest component sits in poor condition, which drives the overall status of this bridge. Because at least one major component scores 4 or lower, the FHWA classifies this bridge as structurally deficient — a maintenance flag, not a closure order. Its NBI inventory load rating is 68.0 metric tons — the load level the structure is rated to carry at inventory (long-term) level.

In a county that maintains hundreds of NBI-tracked bridges, 041 SF TAR HOLLOW is one data point in a Ohio inventory that FHWA inspects on a two-year cycle (more often when ratings fall). Bridge age alone is not a reliable safety signal — a 44-era structure can outperform a newer one when maintenance is consistent, materials are sound, and traffic loads stay within design limits. Use the condition ratings above, the sufficiency score, and the structurally-deficient flag together to read the bridge's real status, and check the linked county and state pages to see how this bridge ranks against its peers.

Every figure on this page comes directly from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory (NBI), the public dataset that catalogs more than 617,000 highway bridges across the United States and is updated annually from the records that each state Department of Transportation submits to the FHWA. The condition codes use the standardized FHWA Recording and Coding Guide, the same scale that determines federal eligibility for the Highway Bridge Program and the Surface Transportation Block Grant set-aside for off-system bridges. A "structurally deficient" classification under those federal criteria is a maintenance and funding flag, never a closure order; states keep deficient bridges open with load posting, weight limits, or accelerated inspection cycles until rehabilitation or replacement is funded. See our methodology for refresh cadence and the exact NBI release vintage powering each record.

How 041 SF TAR HOLLOW compares

▲ 30.5
Load rating vs Ohio average (37.5 t)
Top 5%
Higher load rating than 95% of Ohio bridges
356
Bridges in Ross · 28 structurally deficient
041 SF TAR HOLLOW 68.0 t
Ohio average 37.5 t

NBI inventory load rating (metric tons) and structural-deficiency status compared across Ohio, computed live from the FHWA NBI.

Condition Ratings

Deck
4/9
Poor (1–4)
Superstructure
7/9
Good (7–9)
Substructure
8/9
Good (7–9)
Inventory Load Rating
68.0 t
NBI inventory level (metric tons)
SD Status
Structurally Deficient

Ratings are on a 0–9 scale: 9 = Excellent, 7–8 = Good, 5–6 = Fair, 3–4 = Poor, 0–2 = Critical/Failed. Sufficiency rating (0–100) combines structural adequacy, functional obsolescence, and essentiality.

Structural Details

Year Built
1982
Last Reconstructed
2002
Material
Steel
Number of Spans
1
Structure Length
7.3 m (24 ft)
Deck Width
3.5 m (11 ft)
Owner
State Park/Forest/Reservation
Avg Daily Traffic
20 vehicles/day
Structure Number
7126719

Location

TAR HOLLOW HORSE CAMP, Ross, Ohio
39.319650, -82.776311
View on Google Maps ↗

Data Source

Data from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI). Bridge inspections are required every two years by federal law. Conditions reflect the most recent inspection.

FHWA NBI Program ↗

Condition Analysis

Built in 1982, this bridge is 44 years old and was last reconstructed in 2002. It carries approximately 20 vehicles per day. Based on the most recent FHWA inspection:

  • The deck (driving surface) is in poor condition (4/9), showing advanced deterioration that may require priority repair.
  • The superstructure (beams and supports above the deck) is in good condition (7/9), showing no significant deterioration.
  • The substructure (piers and abutments) is in good condition (8/9), showing no significant deterioration.

Its NBI inventory load rating reflects the load level it is rated to carry. This bridge is classified as structurally deficient, meaning at least one major component is rated in poor condition. This does not mean the bridge is unsafe — it means it requires repair or monitoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for 041 SF TAR HOLLOW?

Bridge condition ratings use a 0–9 scale set by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Ratings 7–9 indicate good condition with no significant problems. Ratings 5–6 mean fair condition with minor issues. Ratings 3–4 indicate poor condition requiring repair. Ratings 0–2 are critical, meaning the bridge has serious structural problems. 041 SF TAR HOLLOW in Ross, Ohio has a deck rating of 4/9, superstructure rating of 7/9, and substructure rating of 8/9.

How often is 041 SF TAR HOLLOW inspected?

Federal law requires most highway bridges to be inspected at least every 24 months. Bridges in poor condition or with known issues may be inspected more frequently (every 12 months or less). 041 SF TAR HOLLOW is part of the National Bridge Inventory maintained by the FHWA. With 20 vehicles crossing daily, regular inspection is essential.

What does "structurally deficient" mean for a bridge?

A structurally deficient bridge has at least one major component (deck, superstructure, or substructure) rated 4 or below on the FHWA 0–9 scale. This classification does NOT mean the bridge is unsafe for travel — it means the bridge needs repair, rehabilitation, or eventual replacement. Structurally deficient bridges remain open and are monitored. 041 SF TAR HOLLOW is currently classified as structurally deficient.

What is the inventory load rating for 041 SF TAR HOLLOW?

The NBI inventory rating is the load level a bridge is rated to carry for an indefinite period, recorded in metric tons. A lower number means the structure is more load-restricted. 041 SF TAR HOLLOW has an inventory load rating of 68.0 metric tons. It is distinct from the FHWA sufficiency rating, a separate 0–100 funding-eligibility score that this dataset does not include.

Who is responsible for maintaining 041 SF TAR HOLLOW?

Bridge ownership and maintenance responsibility varies — bridges may be owned by state DOTs, counties, cities, railroads, or federal agencies. 041 SF TAR HOLLOW is maintained by State Park/Forest/Reservation. The FHWA oversees the National Bridge Inventory program and sets inspection standards, but day-to-day maintenance falls to the owning agency. If you notice damage or safety concerns, contact your state DOT or call 911 for emergencies.

How old is 041 SF TAR HOLLOW and does age affect safety?

041 SF TAR HOLLOW was built in 1982, making it 44 years old. Bridge age alone does not determine safety — condition depends on materials, design, traffic load, maintenance history, and environmental exposure. Many older bridges remain in good condition due to regular maintenance and reconstruction. This bridge was last reconstructed in 2002.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A structurally deficient rating does not mean a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel — it indicates the bridge requires repair or replacement. For current closure or safety information, contact your state DOT.

Related

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges Editorial