FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

SH 227 Log 6.06

Carrying SH 227 Log 6.06 over HALLMAN CREEK

1.4 MI S OF US 270, Garland, Arkansas

Inventory: FHWA NBI 2024 · last ETL August 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Fair
24 t Inventory load rating Lower than 68% of rated Arkansas bridges

SH 227 Log 6.06 in Garland, Arkansas sits above 32% of rated Arkansas bridges on inventory load rating (24 t), while its 1950 build year is earlier than 80% of Garland's recorded-year cohort (319 bridges).

SH 227 Log 6.06 in Garland, Arkansas is rated Fair in the FHWA's 2024 National Bridge Inventory. Built in 1950, it carries 3 rated components on the inspecting agency's 0-9 scale, and its weakest reported component scores 6. The lowest applicable rating sets the federal condition category, so this Fair result describes the weakest reported component rather than the structure as a whole. No NBI category is a closure decision or a live crossing-safety verdict.

NBI record plate

Structure AR:0000000000M2414

INTERSTATE-ERA · CONCRETE · MULTI-SPAN · TIED-CTRL · ARTERIAL-ADT · STANDARD-LOAD · CAT-FAIR

  • INTERSTATE-ERA 1950–1979
  • CONCRETE Concrete
  • MULTI-SPAN 2 spans
  • TIED-CTRL Tied control
  • ARTERIAL-ADT Arterial ADT
  • STANDARD-LOAD Standard load
  • CAT-FAIR Fair

Inspection-sheet codes from this record’s year, material family, spans, controlling component, ADT, inventory load, and NBI category, not a live closure verdict.

Structural health score

A composite of the deck, superstructure, and substructure NBI condition ratings plus the inventory load rating, benchmarked against the full national bridge corpus, distinct from the Good/Fair/Poor category above.

F
Overall Score
24/100
SH 227 Log 6.06
Deck Condition F
6/9
NBI deck condition rating (0=failed, 9=excellent)
Superstructure Condition F
6/9
NBI superstructure condition rating (0=failed, 9=excellent)
Substructure Condition F
6/9
NBI substructure condition rating (0=failed, 9=excellent)
Load Rating F
24 t
NBI inventory load rating vs the national corpus

Bridge Snapshot: SH 227 Log 6.06

The SH 227 Log 6.06 bridge in Garland, Arkansas carries SH 227 Log 6.06 over HALLMAN CREEK. It was built in 1950, making it 76 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete continuous and spans 2 sections, stretching 9.8 meters (32 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 1,821 vehicles, placing it in the moderately-trafficked tier of Arkansas bridges. It is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.

The latest FHWA inspection places the weakest component in fair condition (see the full component ratings below). No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds.

How SH 227 Log 6.06 compares

▼ 2.5
Load rating vs Arkansas average (26.1 t; 12,914 of 12,974 rated)
319
Bridges in Garland · 3 in Poor condition

Age against the county: built in 1950, earlier than 255 of Garland's 319 bridges with a recorded construction year (80%), against a county median build year of 1975. Age is not a defect on its own, but it is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn.

SH 227 Log 6.06 23.6 t
Arkansas average (12,914 of 12,974 rated) 26.1 t

Live comparison across Arkansas bridges with a recorded inventory load rating (12,914 of 12,974 rated).

SH 227 Log 6.06 vs every rated Arkansas bridge

Inventory load rating (metric tons), FHWA NBI, this state

24 Top 68% higher than 32% of 12,914 bridges

rated Arkansas bridges, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more bridges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source FHWA National Bridge Inventory · August 2026

Condition Ratings

Deck
6/9
Fair (5–6)
Superstructure
6/9
Fair (5–6)
Substructure
6/9
Fair (5–6)
Inventory Load Rating
23.6 t
NBI inventory level (metric tons)
Overall Condition
Fair

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Reported 0–9 component ratings from the FHWA NBI. The highlighted component is the lowest reported input to this record’s current condition category; it is not a closure or live crossing-safety decision.

Garland inventory by recorded NBI category

Exclusive Good/Fair/Poor bands across all 319 bridges in this county. Orthogonal to this structure's component profile above: a county catalog share, not a live crossing-safety verdict.

Structural Details

Year Built
1950
Material
Concrete Continuous
Number of Spans
2
Structure Length
9.8 m (32 ft)
Deck Width
6.8 m (22 ft)
Owner
State Highway Agency
Avg Daily Traffic
1,821 vehicles/day
Structure Number
0000000000M2414

Condition Analysis

  • The deck (driving surface) rates fair at 6/9, minor deterioration that routine maintenance should address.
  • The superstructure (beams and supports above the deck) rates fair at 6/9, minor deterioration that routine maintenance should address.
  • At 6/9, the substructure (piers and abutments) shows fair condition, with minor wear flagged for upkeep.

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether SH 227 Log 6.06 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare SH 227 Log 6.06 against other structures in Garland and across Arkansas. Arkansas bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for SH 227 Log 6.06?

SH 227 Log 6.06 in Garland, Arkansas has a deck rating of 6/9, superstructure rating of 6/9, and substructure rating of 6/9 on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is SH 227 Log 6.06 inspected?

SH 227 Log 6.06's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 1,821 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. SH 227 Log 6.06 is currently shown as Fair condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for SH 227 Log 6.06?

SH 227 Log 6.06 has an NBI inventory load rating of 23.6 metric tons.

Who is responsible for maintaining SH 227 Log 6.06?

SH 227 Log 6.06 is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.

How old is SH 227 Log 6.06 and does age affect safety?

SH 227 Log 6.06 was built in 1950, making it 76 years old.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Share this inspection record

Send this source-bounded record or download its data card. An NBI condition category is not a closure or live crossing-safety verdict.

XFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppEmail

Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. Component ratings, ADT, and condition category on this page are copied from the NBI record for this structure; no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2024 NBI release. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.