FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

CTH MS / UNIVERSIT

Carrying CTH MS / UNIVERSIT over LRD OLD MIDDLETON RD

3.2M E JCT USH 12, Dane, Wisconsin

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: CTH MS / UNIVERSIT

The CTH MS / UNIVERSIT bridge in Dane, Wisconsin carries CTH MS / UNIVERSIT over LRD OLD MIDDLETON RD. It was built in 1934, making it 92 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel. Daily traffic averages 4,100 vehicles, placing it in the moderately-trafficked tier of Wisconsin bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How CTH MS / UNIVERSIT compares

624
Bridges in Dane · 35 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Wisconsin.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
65.4 / 100 - historical 50–79.9 band
Structural adequacy /55
49.6
Serviceability /30
7.0
Essentiality /15
8.7
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1934
Material
Steel
Avg Daily Traffic
4,100 vehicles/day
Structure Number
B13095200000000

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether CTH MS / UNIVERSIT is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare CTH MS / UNIVERSIT against other structures in Dane and across Wisconsin. Wisconsin bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for CTH MS / UNIVERSIT?

CTH MS / UNIVERSIT in Dane, Wisconsin on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is CTH MS / UNIVERSIT inspected?

CTH MS / UNIVERSIT's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 4,100 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. CTH MS / UNIVERSIT is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for CTH MS / UNIVERSIT?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for CTH MS / UNIVERSIT.

Who is responsible for maintaining CTH MS / UNIVERSIT?

Ownership is not specified for CTH MS / UNIVERSIT in the NBI.

How old is CTH MS / UNIVERSIT and does age affect safety?

CTH MS / UNIVERSIT was built in 1934, making it 92 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.