FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

ST 97 KILLAM HILL

Carrying ST 97 KILLAM HILL over I 95 NB

4.2 MI N IPSWICH RIVER, Essex, Massachusetts

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: ST 97 KILLAM HILL

The ST 97 KILLAM HILL bridge in Essex, Massachusetts carries ST 97 KILLAM HILL over I 95 NB. It was built in 1951, making it 75 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel continuous. Daily traffic averages 23,000 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of Massachusetts bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. None of this bridge's reported major components fall into the Poor condition range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How ST 97 KILLAM HILL compares

399
Bridges in Essex · 66 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Massachusetts.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
70.8 / 100 - historical 50–79.9 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
6.0
Essentiality /15
11.8
Special reductions
−2.0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1951
Material
Steel Continuous
Avg Daily Traffic
23,000 vehicles/day
Structure Number
B1901430DDOTNBI

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether ST 97 KILLAM HILL is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare ST 97 KILLAM HILL against other structures in Essex and across Massachusetts. Massachusetts bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for ST 97 KILLAM HILL?

ST 97 KILLAM HILL in Essex, Massachusetts on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is ST 97 KILLAM HILL inspected?

ST 97 KILLAM HILL's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 23,000 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. ST 97 KILLAM HILL is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for ST 97 KILLAM HILL?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for ST 97 KILLAM HILL.

Who is responsible for maintaining ST 97 KILLAM HILL?

Ownership is not specified for ST 97 KILLAM HILL in the NBI.

How old is ST 97 KILLAM HILL and does age affect safety?

ST 97 KILLAM HILL was built in 1951, making it 75 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.