LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO
Carrying LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO over TRIBUTARY TO RUSH RIVER
0.4M E JCT USH 63, St. Croix, Wisconsin
Data updated May 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
Bridge Snapshot: LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO
The LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO bridge in St. Croix, Wisconsin carries LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO over TRIBUTARY TO RUSH RIVER. It was built in 2011, making it 15 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 1 section, stretching 6.2 meters (20 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 163 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Wisconsin bridges. It is owned and maintained by Town/Township Highway Agency.
The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 8/9. The weakest component sits in good condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds. Its NBI inventory load rating is 32.4 metric tons.
Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.
How LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO compares
Live comparison across Wisconsin.
Historical Sufficiency Rating
PlainBridge-computedFHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 2011
- Material
- Concrete
- Number of Spans
- 1
- Structure Length
- 6.2 m (20 ft)
- Owner
- Town/Township Highway Agency
- Avg Daily Traffic
- 163 vehicles/day
- Structure Number
- B55027500000000
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗How to read this record
This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
- Compare LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO against other structures in St. Croix and across Wisconsin. Wisconsin bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO?
LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO in St. Croix, Wisconsin on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO inspected?
LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 163 vehicles per day.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO is currently shown as Good condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO?
LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO has an NBI inventory load rating of 32.4 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO?
LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO is owned and maintained by Town/Township Highway Agency.
How old is LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO and does age affect safety?
LRD PIERCE/ST. CRO was built in 2011, making it 15 years old.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.