FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

RUSSELLVILLE ROAD

Carrying RUSSELLVILLE ROAD over RUSSELLVILLE GULCH

.25 MI N OF TOMICHI DR, Douglas, Colorado

Inventory: FHWA NBI 2024 · last ETL August 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Fair
52 t Inventory load rating Higher than 89% of rated Colorado bridges

RUSSELLVILLE ROAD in Douglas, Colorado sits above 89% of rated Colorado bridges on inventory load rating (52 t), while its 1990 build year is earlier than 61% of Douglas's recorded-year cohort (263 bridges).

RUSSELLVILLE ROAD in Douglas, Colorado is rated Fair in the FHWA's 2024 National Bridge Inventory. Built in 1990, it carries 3 rated components on the inspecting agency's 0-9 scale, and its weakest reported component scores 6. The lowest applicable rating sets the federal condition category, so this Fair result describes the weakest reported component rather than the structure as a whole. No NBI category is a closure decision or a live crossing-safety verdict.

NBI record plate

Structure CO:DOU069-06.64A

LATE-CENTURY · CONCRETE · LONG-SPAN-RUN · SUB-LED · ARTERIAL-ADT · HEAVY-LOAD · CAT-FAIR

  • LATE-CENTURY 1980–1999
  • CONCRETE Concrete
  • LONG-SPAN-RUN 4 spans
  • SUB-LED Substructure-led
  • ARTERIAL-ADT Arterial ADT
  • HEAVY-LOAD Heavy load
  • CAT-FAIR Fair

Inspection-sheet codes from this record’s year, material family, spans, controlling component, ADT, inventory load, and NBI category, not a live closure verdict.

Structural health score

A composite of the deck, superstructure, and substructure NBI condition ratings plus the inventory load rating, benchmarked against the full national bridge corpus, distinct from the Good/Fair/Poor category above.

C-
Overall Score
54/100
RUSSELLVILLE ROAD
Deck Condition C-
7/9
NBI deck condition rating (0=failed, 9=excellent)
Superstructure Condition C-
7/9
NBI superstructure condition rating (0=failed, 9=excellent)
Substructure Condition F
6/9
NBI substructure condition rating (0=failed, 9=excellent)
Load Rating A
52 t
NBI inventory load rating vs the national corpus

Bridge Snapshot: RUSSELLVILLE ROAD

The RUSSELLVILLE ROAD bridge in Douglas, Colorado carries RUSSELLVILLE ROAD over RUSSELLVILLE GULCH. It was built in 1990, making it 36 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete continuous and spans 4 sections, stretching 26.5 meters (87 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 3,065 vehicles, placing it in the moderately-trafficked tier of Colorado bridges. It is owned and maintained by County Highway Agency.

The latest FHWA inspection places the weakest component in fair condition (see the full component ratings below). None of this bridge's reported major components fall into the Poor condition range.

How RUSSELLVILLE ROAD compares

▲ 15.1
Load rating vs Colorado average (36.8 t; 8,962 of 8,965 rated)
263
Bridges in Douglas · 6 in Poor condition

Age against the county: built in 1990, earlier than 160 of Douglas's 263 bridges with a recorded construction year (61%), against a county median build year of 1996. Age is not a defect on its own, but it is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn.

RUSSELLVILLE ROAD 51.9 t
Colorado average (8,962 of 8,965 rated) 36.8 t

Live comparison across Colorado bridges with a recorded inventory load rating (8,962 of 8,965 rated).

RUSSELLVILLE ROAD vs every rated Colorado bridge

Inventory load rating (metric tons), FHWA NBI, this state

52 Top 11% higher than 89% of 8,962 bridges

rated Colorado bridges, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more bridges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source FHWA National Bridge Inventory · August 2026

Condition Ratings

Deck
7/9
Good (7–9)
Superstructure
7/9
Good (7–9)
Substructure
6/9
Fair (5–6)
Inventory Load Rating
51.9 t
NBI inventory level (metric tons)
Overall Condition
Fair

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Reported 0–9 component ratings from the FHWA NBI. The highlighted component is the lowest reported input to this record’s current condition category; it is not a closure or live crossing-safety decision.

Douglas inventory by recorded NBI category

Exclusive Good/Fair/Poor bands across all 263 bridges in this county. Orthogonal to this structure's component profile above: a county catalog share, not a live crossing-safety verdict.

Structural Details

Year Built
1990
Material
Concrete Continuous
Number of Spans
4
Structure Length
26.5 m (87 ft)
Deck Width
13.0 m (43 ft)
Owner
County Highway Agency
Avg Daily Traffic
3,065 vehicles/day
Structure Number
DOU069-06.64A

Condition Analysis

  • • The deck (driving surface) is in good condition (7/9), showing no significant deterioration.
  • • The superstructure (beams and supports above the deck) rates good at 7/9, with no significant deterioration on file.
  • • The substructure (piers and abutments) rates fair at 6/9, minor deterioration that routine maintenance should address.

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether RUSSELLVILLE ROAD is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare RUSSELLVILLE ROAD against other structures in Douglas and across Colorado. Colorado bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for RUSSELLVILLE ROAD?

RUSSELLVILLE ROAD in Douglas, Colorado has a deck rating of 7/9, superstructure rating of 7/9, and substructure rating of 6/9 on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is RUSSELLVILLE ROAD inspected?

RUSSELLVILLE ROAD's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 3,065 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. RUSSELLVILLE ROAD is currently shown as Fair condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for RUSSELLVILLE ROAD?

RUSSELLVILLE ROAD has an NBI inventory load rating of 51.9 metric tons.

Who is responsible for maintaining RUSSELLVILLE ROAD?

RUSSELLVILLE ROAD is owned and maintained by County Highway Agency.

How old is RUSSELLVILLE ROAD and does age affect safety?

RUSSELLVILLE ROAD was built in 1990, making it 36 years old.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Share this inspection record

Send this source-bounded record or download its data card. An NBI condition category is not a closure or live crossing-safety verdict.

XFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppEmail

Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. Component ratings, ADT, and condition category on this page are copied from the NBI record for this structure; no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2024 NBI release. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.