MONACO PARKWAY
Carrying MONACO PARKWAY over GOLDSMITH GULCH
AT COLO DR & JEWELL, Denver, Colorado
Data updated May 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
Bridge Snapshot: MONACO PARKWAY
The MONACO PARKWAY bridge in Denver, Colorado carries MONACO PARKWAY over GOLDSMITH GULCH. It was built in 1965, making it 61 years old today. It was last reconstructed in 1995, extending its service life. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 3 sections, stretching 13.6 meters (45 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 15,005 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of Colorado bridges. It is owned and maintained by City/Municipal Highway Agency.
The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 5/9. The weakest component sits in fair condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range. Its NBI inventory load rating is 33.2 metric tons.
Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.
How MONACO PARKWAY compares
Live comparison across Colorado.
Historical Sufficiency Rating
PlainBridge-computedFHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 1965
- Last Reconstructed
- 1995
- Material
- Concrete
- Number of Spans
- 3
- Structure Length
- 13.6 m (45 ft)
- Deck Width
- 38.6 m (127 ft)
- Owner
- City/Municipal Highway Agency
- Avg Daily Traffic
- 15,005 vehicles/day
- Structure Number
- D-11-GG-050A
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗How to read this record
This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether MONACO PARKWAY is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
- Compare MONACO PARKWAY against other structures in Denver and across Colorado. Colorado bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for MONACO PARKWAY?
MONACO PARKWAY in Denver, Colorado on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is MONACO PARKWAY inspected?
MONACO PARKWAY's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 15,005 vehicles per day.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. MONACO PARKWAY is currently shown as Fair condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for MONACO PARKWAY?
MONACO PARKWAY has an NBI inventory load rating of 33.2 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining MONACO PARKWAY?
MONACO PARKWAY is owned and maintained by City/Municipal Highway Agency.
How old is MONACO PARKWAY and does age affect safety?
MONACO PARKWAY was built in 1965, making it 61 years old and last reconstructed in 1995.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.