FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

NJ ROUTE 495 WB

Carrying NJ ROUTE 495 WB over NJ ROUTE 3

INTERCHANGE 16E, Hudson, New Jersey

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: NJ ROUTE 495 WB

The NJ ROUTE 495 WB bridge in Hudson, New Jersey carries NJ ROUTE 495 WB over NJ ROUTE 3. It was built in 1950, making it 76 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel. Daily traffic averages 33,290 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of New Jersey bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. None of this bridge's reported major components fall into the Poor condition range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How NJ ROUTE 495 WB compares

202
Bridges in Hudson · 6 in Poor condition

Live comparison across New Jersey.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
88.1 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
24.0
Essentiality /15
10.1
Special reductions
−1.0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1950
Material
Steel
Avg Daily Traffic
33,290 vehicles/day
Structure Number
E11258C

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether NJ ROUTE 495 WB is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare NJ ROUTE 495 WB against other structures in Hudson and across New Jersey. New Jersey bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for NJ ROUTE 495 WB?

NJ ROUTE 495 WB in Hudson, New Jersey on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is NJ ROUTE 495 WB inspected?

NJ ROUTE 495 WB's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 33,290 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. NJ ROUTE 495 WB is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for NJ ROUTE 495 WB?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for NJ ROUTE 495 WB.

Who is responsible for maintaining NJ ROUTE 495 WB?

Ownership is not specified for NJ ROUTE 495 WB in the NBI.

How old is NJ ROUTE 495 WB and does age affect safety?

NJ ROUTE 495 WB was built in 1950, making it 76 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.