FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

COUNTY ROAD 129

Carrying COUNTY ROAD 129 over I 70 ML SR

W END OF GLENWOOD CANYON, Garfield, Colorado

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: COUNTY ROAD 129

The COUNTY ROAD 129 bridge in Garfield, Colorado carries COUNTY ROAD 129 over I 70 ML SR. It was built in 1966, making it 60 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete continuous. Daily traffic averages 16,000 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of Colorado bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How COUNTY ROAD 129 compares

167
Bridges in Garfield · 2 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Colorado.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
57.9 / 100 - historical 50–79.9 band
Structural adequacy /55
42.1
Serviceability /30
5.0
Essentiality /15
13.8
Special reductions
−3.0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1966
Material
Concrete Continuous
Avg Daily Traffic
16,000 vehicles/day
Structure Number
F-07-P

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether COUNTY ROAD 129 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare COUNTY ROAD 129 against other structures in Garfield and across Colorado. Colorado bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for COUNTY ROAD 129?

COUNTY ROAD 129 in Garfield, Colorado on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is COUNTY ROAD 129 inspected?

COUNTY ROAD 129's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 16,000 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. COUNTY ROAD 129 is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for COUNTY ROAD 129?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for COUNTY ROAD 129.

Who is responsible for maintaining COUNTY ROAD 129?

Ownership is not specified for COUNTY ROAD 129 in the NBI.

How old is COUNTY ROAD 129 and does age affect safety?

COUNTY ROAD 129 was built in 1966, making it 60 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.