FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

M 22

Carrying M 22 over COTTONWOOD RIVER

0.6 MI S OF JCT CSAH 15, Redwood, Minnesota

Inventory: FHWA NBI 2024 · last ETL August 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Poor
12 t Inventory load rating Lower than 99% of rated Minnesota bridges

M 22 in Redwood, Minnesota sits above 1% of rated Minnesota bridges on inventory load rating (12 t), while its 1918 build year is earlier than 98% of Redwood's recorded-year cohort (200 bridges).

M 22 in Redwood, Minnesota is rated Poor in the FHWA's 2024 National Bridge Inventory. Built in 1918, it carries 3 rated components on the inspecting agency's 0-9 scale, and its weakest reported component scores 4. The lowest applicable rating sets the federal condition category, so this Poor result describes the weakest reported component rather than the structure as a whole. No NBI category is a closure decision or a live crossing-safety verdict.

NBI record plate

Structure MN:1238

PRE-1950 · CONCRETE · LONG-SPAN-RUN · SUB-LED · LOCAL-ADT · LIGHT-LOAD · CAT-POOR

  • PRE-1950 Pre-1950
  • CONCRETE Concrete
  • LONG-SPAN-RUN 4 spans
  • SUB-LED Substructure-led
  • LOCAL-ADT Local ADT
  • LIGHT-LOAD Light load
  • CAT-POOR Poor

Inspection-sheet codes from this record’s year, material family, spans, controlling component, ADT, inventory load, and NBI category, not a live closure verdict.

Bridge Snapshot: M 22

The M 22 bridge in Redwood, Minnesota carries M 22 over COTTONWOOD RIVER. It was built in 1918, making it 108 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 4 sections, stretching 43.4 meters (142 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 70 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Minnesota bridges. It is owned and maintained by City/Municipal Highway Agency.

The latest FHWA inspection records show a deck rating of 5/9, superstructure at 5/9, substructure at 4/9. The weakest component sits in poor condition. A component scored 4 or below, placing this bridge in the federal Poor condition category rather than declaring it unsafe or closed.

How M 22 compares

▼ 23.7
Load rating vs Minnesota average (35.8 t; 13,532 rated)
200
Bridges in Redwood · 21 in Poor condition

Age against the county: built in 1918, earlier than 195 of Redwood's 200 bridges with a recorded construction year (98%), against a county median build year of 1988. Age is not a defect on its own, but it is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn.

M 22 12.1 t
Minnesota average (13,532 rated) 35.8 t

Live comparison across Minnesota bridges with a recorded inventory load rating (13,532 rated).

M 22 vs every rated Minnesota bridge

Inventory load rating (metric tons), FHWA NBI, this state

12 Top 99% higher than 1% of 13,532 bridges

rated Minnesota bridges, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more bridges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source FHWA National Bridge Inventory · August 2026

Condition Ratings

Deck
5/9
Fair (5–6)
Superstructure
5/9
Fair (5–6)
Substructure
4/9
Poor (1–4)
Inventory Load Rating
12.1 t
NBI inventory level (metric tons)
Overall Condition
Poor

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Reported 0–9 component ratings from the FHWA NBI. The highlighted component is the lowest reported input to this record’s current condition category; it is not a closure or live crossing-safety decision.

Redwood inventory by recorded NBI category

Exclusive Good/Fair/Poor bands across all 200 bridges in this county. Orthogonal to this structure's component profile above: a county catalog share, not a live crossing-safety verdict.

Structural Details

Year Built
1918
Material
Concrete
Number of Spans
4
Structure Length
43.4 m (142 ft)
Deck Width
5.5 m (18 ft)
Owner
City/Municipal Highway Agency
Avg Daily Traffic
70 vehicles/day
Structure Number
1238

Condition Analysis

  • The deck (driving surface) is in fair condition (5/9), with minor deterioration that may require routine maintenance.
  • At 5/9, the superstructure (beams and supports above the deck) shows fair condition, with minor wear flagged for upkeep.
  • The substructure (piers and abutments) is in poor condition (4/9), showing advanced deterioration on the inspecting agency's 0-9 scale.

How to read this record

M 22 is in the federal Poor condition category. That is a component-based result, not a closure order.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Understand what Poor condition does and does not mean before drawing conclusions. Poor condition explained
  • Compare M 22 against other structures in Redwood and across Minnesota. Minnesota bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for M 22?

M 22 in Redwood, Minnesota has a deck rating of 5/9, superstructure rating of 5/9, and substructure rating of 4/9 on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is M 22 inspected?

M 22's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 70 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. M 22 is currently shown as Poor condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for M 22?

M 22 has an NBI inventory load rating of 12.1 metric tons.

Who is responsible for maintaining M 22?

M 22 is owned and maintained by City/Municipal Highway Agency.

How old is M 22 and does age affect safety?

M 22 was built in 1918, making it 108 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Share this inspection record

Send this source-bounded record or download its data card. An NBI condition category is not a closure or live crossing-safety verdict.

XFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppEmail

Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. Component ratings, ADT, and condition category on this page are copied from the NBI record for this structure; no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2024 NBI release. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.