MIRA LOMA
Carrying MIRA LOMA over STEAMBOAT CREEK
STEAMBOAT, Washoe, Nevada
Inventory: FHWA NBI 2024 · last ETL August 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
MIRA LOMA in Washoe, Nevada sits above 64% of rated Nevada bridges on inventory load rating (49 t), while its 1991 build year is earlier than 46% of Washoe's recorded-year cohort (334 bridges).
MIRA LOMA in Washoe, Nevada is rated Fair in the FHWA's 2024 National Bridge Inventory. Built in 1991, it carries 1 rated component on the inspecting agency's 0-9 scale, and its weakest reported component scores 6. The lowest applicable rating sets the federal condition category, so this Fair result describes the weakest reported component rather than the structure as a whole. No NBI category is a closure decision or a live crossing-safety verdict.
NBI record plate
Structure NV:B1953
LATE-CENTURY · CONCRETE · MULTI-SPAN · CULVERT-LED · HEAVY-ADT · HEAVY-LOAD · CAT-FAIR
- LATE-CENTURY 1980–1999
- CONCRETE Concrete
- MULTI-SPAN 3 spans
- CULVERT-LED Culvert-led
- HEAVY-ADT Heavy ADT
- HEAVY-LOAD Heavy load
- CAT-FAIR Fair
Inspection-sheet codes from this record’s year, material family, spans, controlling component, ADT, inventory load, and NBI category, not a live closure verdict.
Bridge Snapshot: MIRA LOMA
The MIRA LOMA bridge in Washoe, Nevada carries MIRA LOMA over STEAMBOAT CREEK. It was built in 1991, making it 35 years old today. It was last reconstructed in 2018, extending its service life. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 3 sections, stretching 15.5 meters (51 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 14,600 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of Nevada bridges. It is owned and maintained by City/Municipal Highway Agency.
The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 6/9. The weakest component sits in fair condition. None of this bridge's reported major components fall into the Poor condition range.
How MIRA LOMA compares
Age against the county: built in 1991, earlier than 153 of Washoe's 334 bridges with a recorded construction year (46%), against a county median build year of 1989. This is one of the newer structures in its county.
Live comparison across Nevada bridges with a recorded inventory load rating (2,090 of 2,099 rated).
MIRA LOMA vs every rated Nevada bridge
Inventory load rating (metric tons), FHWA NBI, this state
49 Top 36% higher than 64% of 2,090 bridges
rated Nevada bridges, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more bridges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source FHWA National Bridge Inventory · August 2026
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Washoe inventory by recorded NBI category
Exclusive Good/Fair/Poor bands across all 334 bridges in this county. Orthogonal to this structure's component profile above: a county catalog share, not a live crossing-safety verdict.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 1991
- Last Reconstructed
- 2018
- Material
- Concrete
- Number of Spans
- 3
- Structure Length
- 15.5 m (51 ft)
- Deck Width
- 13.4 m (44 ft)
- Owner
- City/Municipal Highway Agency
- Avg Daily Traffic
- 14,600 vehicles/day
- Structure Number
- B1953
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗How to read this record
This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether MIRA LOMA is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
- Compare MIRA LOMA against other structures in Washoe and across Nevada. Nevada bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for MIRA LOMA?
MIRA LOMA in Washoe, Nevada on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is MIRA LOMA inspected?
MIRA LOMA's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 14,600 vehicles per day.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. MIRA LOMA is currently shown as Fair condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for MIRA LOMA?
MIRA LOMA has an NBI inventory load rating of 49.0 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining MIRA LOMA?
MIRA LOMA is owned and maintained by City/Municipal Highway Agency.
How old is MIRA LOMA and does age affect safety?
MIRA LOMA was built in 1991, making it 35 years old and last reconstructed in 2018.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Share this inspection record
Send this source-bounded record or download its data card. An NBI condition category is not a closure or live crossing-safety verdict.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. Component ratings, ADT, and condition category on this page are copied from the NBI record for this structure; no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2024 NBI release. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.