FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

RTE 104A

Carrying RTE 104A over STERLING CREEK

.4 MI N JCT SH 104A & SH, Cayuga, New York

Inventory: FHWA NBI 2024 · last ETL August 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Poor
18 t Inventory load rating Lower than 95% of rated New York bridges

RTE 104A in Cayuga, New York sits above 5% of rated New York bridges on inventory load rating (18 t), while its 1910 build year is earlier than 96% of Cayuga's recorded-year cohort (148 bridges).

RTE 104A in Cayuga, New York is rated Poor in the FHWA's 2024 National Bridge Inventory. Built in 1910, it carries 2 rated components on the inspecting agency's 0-9 scale, and its weakest reported component scores 4. The lowest applicable rating sets the federal condition category, so this Poor result describes the weakest reported component rather than the structure as a whole. No NBI category is a closure decision or a live crossing-safety verdict.

NBI record plate

Structure NY:000000001036660

PRE-1950 · CONCRETE · SINGLE-SPAN · SUPER-LED · ARTERIAL-ADT · LIGHT-LOAD · CAT-POOR

  • PRE-1950 Pre-1950
  • CONCRETE Concrete
  • SINGLE-SPAN Single span
  • SUPER-LED Superstructure-led
  • ARTERIAL-ADT Arterial ADT
  • LIGHT-LOAD Light load
  • CAT-POOR Poor

Inspection-sheet codes from this record’s year, material family, spans, controlling component, ADT, inventory load, and NBI category, not a live closure verdict.

Bridge Snapshot: RTE 104A

The RTE 104A bridge in Cayuga, New York carries RTE 104A over STERLING CREEK. It was built in 1910, making it 116 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 1 section, stretching 12.2 meters (40 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 1,324 vehicles, placing it in the moderately-trafficked tier of New York bridges. It is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.

The latest FHWA inspection records show superstructure at 4/9, substructure at 5/9. The weakest component sits in poor condition. A component scored 4 or below, placing this bridge in the federal Poor condition category rather than declaring it unsafe or closed.

How RTE 104A compares

▼ 23.9
Load rating vs New York average (41.7 t; 17,641 of 17,642 rated)
148
Bridges in Cayuga · 25 in Poor condition

Age against the county: built in 1910, earlier than 142 of Cayuga's 148 bridges with a recorded construction year (96%), against a county median build year of 1973. Age is not a defect on its own, but it is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn.

RTE 104A 17.8 t
New York average (17,641 of 17,642 rated) 41.7 t

Live comparison across New York bridges with a recorded inventory load rating (17,641 of 17,642 rated).

RTE 104A vs every rated New York bridge

Inventory load rating (metric tons), FHWA NBI, this state

18 Top 95% higher than 5% of 17,641 bridges

rated New York bridges, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more bridges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source FHWA National Bridge Inventory · August 2026

Condition Ratings

Superstructure
4/9
Poor (1–4)
Substructure
5/9
Fair (5–6)
Inventory Load Rating
17.8 t
NBI inventory level (metric tons)
Overall Condition
Poor

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Reported 0–9 component ratings from the FHWA NBI. The highlighted component is the lowest reported input to this record’s current condition category; it is not a closure or live crossing-safety decision.

Cayuga inventory by recorded NBI category

Exclusive Good/Fair/Poor bands across all 148 bridges in this county. Orthogonal to this structure's component profile above: a county catalog share, not a live crossing-safety verdict.

Structural Details

Year Built
1910
Material
Concrete
Number of Spans
1
Structure Length
12.2 m (40 ft)
Deck Width
9.4 m (31 ft)
Owner
State Highway Agency
Avg Daily Traffic
1,324 vehicles/day
Structure Number
000000001036660

Condition Analysis

  • At 4/9, the superstructure (beams and supports above the deck) is in poor shape, with advanced wear on file for this vintage.
  • The substructure (piers and abutments) rates fair at 5/9, minor deterioration that routine maintenance should address.

How to read this record

RTE 104A is in the federal Poor condition category. That is a component-based result, not a closure order.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Understand what Poor condition does and does not mean before drawing conclusions. Poor condition explained
  • Compare RTE 104A against other structures in Cayuga and across New York. New York bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for RTE 104A?

RTE 104A in Cayuga, New York, superstructure rating of 4/9, and substructure rating of 5/9 on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is RTE 104A inspected?

RTE 104A's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 1,324 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. RTE 104A is currently shown as Poor condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for RTE 104A?

RTE 104A has an NBI inventory load rating of 17.8 metric tons.

Who is responsible for maintaining RTE 104A?

RTE 104A is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.

How old is RTE 104A and does age affect safety?

RTE 104A was built in 1910, making it 116 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Share this inspection record

Send this source-bounded record or download its data card. An NBI condition category is not a closure or live crossing-safety verdict.

XFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppEmail

Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. Component ratings, ADT, and condition category on this page are copied from the NBI record for this structure; no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2024 NBI release. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.